Assuming my vote counts, something I'm not sure about since I'm not a felix committer and I never could work out that part of the "rules"
On 4 February 2011 17:17, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: > On 2/4/11 12:10, Alasdair Nottingham wrote: >> >> In that case I change my non-binding B vote to a non-binding A vote. >> >> A (non-binding). > > The balance has tipped...A is now ahead by two! :-o > > -> richard > >> On 4 February 2011 16:37, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 2/4/11 11:29, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>>> >>>> Just to be clear does "failed release" mean: >>>> >>>> i) a release whose artifacts were published e.g. to apache.org/dist or >>>> maven central then found to be bad >>>> ii) a release that failed before the artifacts were published >>>> >>>> I had been working to ii) but I can see there could be confusion. >>> >>> Yes, (ii). This is when we call a vote, but then decide to cancel the >>> vote >>> for some reason. So the artifacts have never made it into maven central >>> or >>> apache.org/dist. >>> >>> -> richard >>> >>>> Jeremy >>>> >>>> On 4 February 2011 08:50, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Following the discussion, I'm starting a vote to decide on a policy >>>>> for failed releases. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] A - Releases following a failed release can reuse the same version >>>>> [ ] B - Releases following a failed release must use a different >>>>> version >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be opened for at least 72 hours. >>>>> Happy voting! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Open Source SOA >>>>> http://fusesource.com >>>>> >> >> > -- Alasdair Nottingham n...@apache.org
