Uhhhh ok.. let me see if I can belatedly recapture the brilliance.. I think it was simply the observation that if the end result was to have many repos, couldn't each subproject just start pealing itself off into a git repo as it sees fit?
Call it lazy migration if you will. The side effects are going to be limited to those sub projects as they are in transition. But the bulk of main project can safely continue to work in the meantime. That's the entire anti-climactic idea. - Ray On Dec 1, 2015 9:02 AM, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote > > It sure seems as if there are no PMC members fond enough of the git > > idea to call a vote. I'm treating this as a dead topic for now. > > > Looks like :( > > I had a brief discussion two weeks ago with Ray, and he had an > interesting idea. @Ray do you want to bring it up? > > Regards > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe Research Switzerland > cziege...@apache.org >
