Benson Margulies wrote > I would like to peel the bundle plugin. Does any pmc member sympathize > sufficiently to start a vote to test consensus to do that?
I don't want to be a PITA, but would you care about writing a more detailed description of what that would mean? (git repo name, how it is set up) I'm actually not sure what it would need as a description but definitely a little bit more than just saying "move to git" :) I wouldn't mind starting a vote based on that - unless someone signals that this is a stupid idea :) Carsten > > On Dec 1, 2015 9:38 AM, "Raymond Auge" <raymond.a...@liferay.com > <mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>> wrote: > > Uhhhh ok.. let me see if I can belatedly recapture the brilliance.. > > I think it was simply the observation that if the end result was to have > many repos, couldn't each subproject just start pealing itself off > into a > git repo as it sees fit? > > Call it lazy migration if you will. > > The side effects are going to be limited to those sub projects as > they are > in transition. But the bulk of main project can safely continue to > work in > the meantime. > > That's the entire anti-climactic idea. > > - Ray > On Dec 1, 2015 9:02 AM, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org > <mailto:cziege...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > Benson Margulies wrote > > > It sure seems as if there are no PMC members fond enough of the git > > > idea to call a vote. I'm treating this as a dead topic for now. > > > > > Looks like :( > > > > I had a brief discussion two weeks ago with Ray, and he had an > > interesting idea. @Ray do you want to bring it up? > > > > Regards > > Carsten > > -- > > Carsten Ziegeler > > Adobe Research Switzerland > > cziege...@apache.org <mailto:cziege...@apache.org> > > > -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
