Richard S. Hall wrote > > Well, the argument to the contrary is perhaps that is makes it more > difficult for us as a community to have oversight into releases. It > almost assures us that some/many community members will never checkout > subprojects that aren't in the repository they normally work. Granted, > there is no guarantee of this now, since I can just check out what I > want anyway...but at least it is fairly easy for me to do so now and it > becomes more difficult if everyone spreads to their own repos. > > So, in that regard, I'm more aligned with Marcel...all or nothing makes > more sense.
Hmm, ok fair point - however, the *all* is the problematic part where we couldn't agree on last time (one git repo vs many git repos). We could still provide a script in the root of svn which checks out the moved projects from git and gives the same experience :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
