https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~bimargul...@gmail.com/Felix+and+Git
? On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: > On 12/1/15 13:40 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >> Richard S. Hall wrote >>> >>> Well, the argument to the contrary is perhaps that is makes it more >>> difficult for us as a community to have oversight into releases. It >>> almost assures us that some/many community members will never checkout >>> subprojects that aren't in the repository they normally work. Granted, >>> there is no guarantee of this now, since I can just check out what I >>> want anyway...but at least it is fairly easy for me to do so now and it >>> becomes more difficult if everyone spreads to their own repos. >>> >>> So, in that regard, I'm more aligned with Marcel...all or nothing makes >>> more sense. >> >> Hmm, ok fair point - however, the *all* is the problematic part where we >> couldn't agree on last time (one git repo vs many git repos). > > > But isn't it then incumbent on those wanting such changes to convince us one > way or the other? > > Personally, I'd rather just have one big git repo if we are going to switch, > if for no other reason than it seems like less overhead. However, I admit to > not really knowing the advantages/disadvantages. > > Regardless, at a minimum, perhaps someone should create a documented > pros/cons list for the approaches. This would at least give us a way to call > a vote where we can feel somewhat informed about the choices (i.e., stay > with svn, move to one git repo, move to many git repos). > > Better than saying, "there is no consensus, so let's just go our separate > ways"... > > -> richard > > >> >> We could still provide a script in the root of svn which checks out the >> moved projects from git and gives the same experience :) >> >> Carsten > >
