On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Conceptually, I don't understand why you would want to have more than "just > a UI framework", if your goal is to make use of the GPU. > > The fewer dependencies the better. > > @Avi, I see memory management, and server communication as important aspects of MadComponents. Not dependencies. How do you mean? @Michael, I don't see anything wrong with drawing a line as to how much more my time I can dedicate to this project. Or asking for commitment and work from the Open Flex developers. I just didn't want everyone to run away with the idea that I was going to do ALL the work (in my experience, people usually expect that). MadComponents/MC3D are free and open source. http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php I wouldn't be adverse to maintaining it under Apache, as I think that getting more developers involved in the core MadComponents/MC3D classes could be positive. But it's a little early to talk about that now. I was thinking we should maintain the code separation between the Flex wrappers, and the core MadComponents/MC3D classes.
