Just keep in mind that Jenkins runs as a server and could use the same port (80) that Mustella's server runs by default. To avoid this problem, make sure that you use a different port for Mustella.
Also, it would be best if you run a full run of Mustella from the command line at least once before attempting to run it from Jenkins. Would make your life easier :-) On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the config xml for local checkin_tests job that I set up on my > machine [1]. You will need to modify it to run Mustella. If you could do > that and share the Jenkins config xml with the group, that would be great! > > [1] http://pastebin.com/ydDWRwR9 > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:41 AM, JP Bader <j...@zavteq.com> wrote: > >> Same here, I have a box that I could probably toss into the mix, if anyone >> can give me a configuration image or something similar, I can boot up a >> win >> box and make a CI happen as well. >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hmm, I have a spare desktop, what is needed to turn it into a ci >> server? It >> > has 2gb ram and is about 5 years old. >> > On Feb 19, 2013 8:25 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > The problem with Apache CI is that there are a lot of restrictions. >> > > Running tests for hours together is not an option. Moreover, since >> it >> > is >> > > a shared environment, the build servers go down a lot and it takes >> > > weeks/months to get a broken job fixed. >> > > >> > > We need something robust that we can manage ourselves. It does not >> have >> > to >> > > be a hosted VM, it can as well be someone's unused computer somewhere. >> > One >> > > could theoretically install Jenkins and set up a job to pull every >> night >> > > and run the tests. I >> > > >> > > In my case, I don't have any spare computers, so I started toying >> around >> > > with Amazon EC2. If someone can set it up anywhere and let the group >> > know >> > > when things break, that would be a good start. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Om >> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Christofer Dutz < >> > > christofer.d...@c-ware.de >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Well I guess no matter what ci system, we would need a server for >> that. >> > > > Apache uses Jenkins. It was just an assumption, that eventually >> > Jetbrains >> > > > could eventually provide us with one, just fit the sake of >> > > > pre-tested-commits and pre-tested-pull-requests. If it was just for >> the >> > > > nightly build, Jenkins does just fine. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Chris >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android >> > > > http://www.aqua-mail.com >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Am 19. Februar 2013 17:47:01 schrieb Frédéric THOMAS < >> > > > webdoubl...@hotmail.com>: >> > > > >> > > > It doesn't sound to be worthy guys but as soon as will move on >> git, as >> > > >> stated Chris, getting teamcity can maybe do the trick. >> > > >> >> > > >> -Fred >> > > >> >> > > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> > > >> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski >> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:39 PM >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> Subject: Re: Mustella on Amazon EC2 >> > > >> >> > > >> Other costs you need to be aware of are S3/EBS storage and >> bandwidth. >> > > >> These could equal the amount of the per-hour charge (or more, in >> some >> > of >> > > >> my cases). It all depends on how much traffic you are sending, and >> > how >> > > >> much you are storing... If you are pulling full builds each night, >> > that >> > > >> could be quite a bit.. >> > > >> >> > > >> -Nick >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Erik de Bruin < >> e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > From [1]: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Heavy Utilization Reserved Instance (medium size) on a 3 year >> > contract >> > > >> > would mean something like $600 up front and $0.066 per hour. If >> we >> > run >> > > >> > once a day, and it takes 12 hours to run (guessing here), that >> would >> > > >> > mean 3*365*12*0.066 = ~ $870. So running the thing for 3 years >> would >> > > >> > take something like $1500. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Are there any other costs that this page is neatly hiding (data >> > > >> > transfer, access)? >> > > >> > >> > > >> > If we do a Wikipedia style drive for funds, we should be able to >> get >> > > >> > that kind of money together, couldn't we? >> > > >> > >> > > >> > EdB >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 1: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/**pricing/< >> > > http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/> >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Erik de Bruin < >> e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Anyone with experience care to make a guess what a sufficiently >> > > >> > > powerful instance would cost per month? I for one would be >> willing >> > > to >> > > >> > > donate a couple of dollars (at least) per month to see this >> > happen, >> > > >> > > and I'm sure more people will feel the same way... >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > EdB >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:42 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de >> > > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Well I spoke with >> > > >> > >> Toan Nguyen >> > > >> > >> Enterprise Sales Manager >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> I have no idea if there is anyone we should better contact. >> > > >> > >> All I did was fill out the form on the AWS Sales site. He was >> the >> > > one >> > > >> > responding to this and this morning we spoke a few minutes. >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> To me it looked as if Amazon wasn't really willing to provide >> > > Medium >> > > >> > Windows instances free of charge. He claimed that Amazon >> couldn't go >> > > >> > around >> > > >> > giveing away free nodes to everyone (At least this was the >> essence >> > of >> > > >> what >> > > >> > he told me). >> > > >> > >> Eventaully someone else might think differently. >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> Chris >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> ______________________________**__________ >> > > >> > >> Von: Harbs [gavha...@gmail.com] >> > > >> > >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2013 13:47 >> > > >> > >> An: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> > >> Betreff: Re: Mustella on Amazon EC2 >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> Did you speak to anyone with authority there, or was it just a >> > > canned >> > > >> > response? >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> If anyone has a real contact at AWS, the answer might be >> > > different. I >> > > >> > can't imagine it costs them very much to donate some resources to >> > > Apache >> > > >> > Flex… Anyone have a contact there? >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> I personally use AWS, but not on the scale that I have any >> real >> > > pull… >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> On Feb 19, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> Well unfortunately I don't have good news :-( just tasked to >> > them >> > > >> and >> > > >> > it seems they don't want to do more than give us their 1 year >> free >> > > >> offer. >> > > >> > Unfortunately that doesn't cover windows and medium sized >> instances. >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> I think a CI nightly build is essential for getting a stable >> > > trunk. >> > > >> > Especially with more and more people contributing and not ruining >> > the >> > > >> > entire test suite. >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> Chris >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android >> > > >> > >>> http://www.aqua-mail.com >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> Am 19. Februar 2013 09:04:32 schrieb Om < >> bigosma...@gmail.com>: >> > > >> > >>>> Chris, >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> You are awesome! I never thought of contacting them and >> just >> > > >> asking >> > > >> > :-) >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> Agree with Justin, it needs to be a Windows instance. >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> Please let me know how I can help. >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> Thanks, >> > > >> > >>>> Om >> > > >> > >>>> On Feb 18, 2013 11:02 PM, "Christofer Dutz" < >> > > >> > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> > > >> > >>>> wrote: >> > > >> > >>>> >> > > >> > >>>> > Thanks for that info on the needed platform. The good >> thing >> > > about >> > > >> > an open >> > > >> > >>>> > source project is, that anyone could setup a ci-server and >> > > build >> > > >> > >>>> > the >> > > >> > >>>> > projects trunk. But I'll stick to asking them. We can >> always >> > > >> decide >> > > >> > on how >> > > >> > >>>> > we do it a soon as we have something do decide about :-) >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> > Chris >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> > Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android >> > > >> > >>>> > http://www.aqua-mail.com >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> > Am 19. Februar 2013 07:52:15 schrieb Justin Mclean < >> > > >> > >>>> > jus...@classsoftware.com>: >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> >> Hi, >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> Nice one. Not sure if Apache policy would have an impact >> on >> > > >> this, >> > > >> > as >> > > >> > >>>> >> we're not externally hosting anything or the list just >> using >> > > it >> > > >> as >> > > >> > a test >> > > >> > >>>> >> server I can't see any obvious issues but they do like to >> > keep >> > > >> > everything >> > > >> > >>>> >> in house (for legal and other reasons). >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > I was intending on asking for a medium Windows machine >> (or >> > > >> > bigger) ... >> > > >> > >>>> >> if however Windows is not a must, I could try to get from >> > them >> > > >> > what they >> > > >> > >>>> >> are willing to give in Linux ;-) >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> Currently as the SDK only compiles on windows (or OSX) >> and >> > the >> > > >> > tests only >> > > >> > >>>> >> run in the Flash Projector it really has to be windows >> (or >> > > OSX). >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> Justin >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>>> > >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > Ix Multimedia Software >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> > > >> > > 3521 VB Utrecht >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > T. 06-51952295 >> > > >> > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > -- >> > > >> > Ix Multimedia Software >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> > > >> > 3521 VB Utrecht >> > > >> > >> > > >> > T. 06-51952295 >> > > >> > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> JP Bader >> Principal >> Zavteq, Inc. >> @lordB8r | j...@zavteq.com >> 608.692.2468 >> > >
