Ok :)
A branch (and generaly the main branch of a repo) should belong to a project
(a directory structure) and not shared
by force (it can be a local branch only), the point is that, even with what
INFRA is proposing us, as soon as we will want to do a branch, we'll have to
incorporate every whiteboard inside of it because there's only one master
for everybody, so, that's not good, create a branch per user in the
whiteboard is almost the same problematic, instead of being horizontal
problem (shared file structure), it is a vertical one (shared branches),
moving to github, yes, only if there's a repo per committer but I'm not sure
it is the apache way and finally staying on svn allows us to use svn or
git-svn (which takes a lot of time to initialize) for those who want to use
git.
Finally, I guess the 2 last ones are close to what I need and really the
last one let me the possibility to have a repo per project (even if there
are inside the same svn repo) if I go by git-svn.
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Om
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:40 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] How do we want to handle Whiteboard?
Just to make it clear, this is not the VOTE thread. We usually discuss
pros and cons of each item in a DISCUSS thread before calling a vote.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
<webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote:
4. Let whiteboards remain in SVN +1
-Fred
-----Message d'origine----- From: Om
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:34 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] How do we want to handle Whiteboard?
Sorry, I have not been tracking the votes. Let me start up a new vote with
these options:
==============================**=====
What to do with Whiteboard?
1. Use the sparse checkout option as described here (
http://markmail.org/message/**dg7hplezkzwiroes<http://markmail.org/message/dg7hplezkzwiroes>
)
2. Create a branch per user in the whiteboard
3. Move to github for whiteboards
4. Let whiteboards remain in SVN
==============================**=====
If there are more options, please add it to the discussion here. I will
give some time for discussion before starting an official VOTE thread.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
**wrote:
Om,
Btw, I remove my vote of 3.1 and give my +1 to the 3.4 (stay on svn),
that's a lazy vote, I can change my mind ?
-Fred
