The code in question is on GitHub:
https://github.com/Flextras/FlextrasComponents
On 5/28/2013 2:06 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
Or until they get enough interest in the abandoned code... run it out of a
GitHub account outside of the formal apache process until it gains enough
momentum.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:03 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do we want Abandoned Code?
+1, with the reservation that we don't want any and all code out there ;-)
EdB
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:58 PM, aYo ~ <a...@binitie.com> wrote:
If the donated assets are relevant to flex development I see no reason why
not. Development of those assets ceased mainly because there was a loss of
faith, we on the other hand believe in the project and are moving it on,
n'est pas ?
On 28 May 2013 18:50, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:
On 5/28/2013 12:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Personally, I'd
be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of Flex-related code
even if there is no active development for it.
What do others think of this sentiment?
I could get the Flextras components donated, but didn't because assumed
Apache Flex didn't want to be the dumping ground for 'abandoned code'
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
