+1 (non binding), really like Swiz
On 29-05-2013, at 11:42, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes > the vote thread. > > This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache > Flex, since there is multiple opinions in the Apache Flex community. > > points to take into account: > > * Swiz is a great addition to Apache Flex since it complements de SDK with > a microarquitecture for application MVC, IOC, DI very simple and well > designed. > * This will be a project like flexunit or utilities. So it's optional a NOT > part of the main sdk. > * Swiz is already in 1.4.0 stable version, under Apache License 2.0, has > its community and right now there's no maintenance or upgrade since people > behind the project is no longer working with Flex technology. > * Donation will be 1.4.0 source code and wiki content. > * Future plans: if donation is successful, Chris Scott (creator of Swiz) > will want to donate experimental 2.0.0 branch that brings AOP support, a > feature that could bring a great benefit to Apache Flex since it brings > something very new to client web technologies and that will require > evolution at compiler level (introducing compile time weaving). > > Points that some people argument to not accept the donation: > * There is other frameworks like Swiz out there in the same situation and > this donation could make Swiz the preferred/recommended IOC framework of > use. > > Points to take into account: > * Erik de bruin stated that maybe the problem is "what to do with it" under > Apache Flex umbrella. > > > Please make your vote. > > Thanks > > Carlos Rovira Met vriendelijke groet, Arnoud Bos Artim interactive E arn...@artim-interactive.nl W www.artim-interactive.nl T +31 6 246 40 216 A Elisabeth Wolffstraat 77-3 1053TT Amsterdam
