On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > On 7/30/13 3:12 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 7/30/13 8:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> Crap, modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/ProductInfo.java needs > >> >Are we sure changing an externally visible string wont break any third > >> >party tools ? > >> >Maybe ones that are trying to spot Flex Applications by looking for it, > >> >for instance ? > >> Valid concern, but I still think we should change. > >> > > >> >Is this a good time to run a 'grep' over the source code for the work > >> >'Adobe' then ? > >> I did scan the compiler for "Adobe Flex". That was the only one I > >>thought > >> needed to change. There are other instances that are historical and > >> should probably stay. > >> > >> > >Could you please give us an idea on why this change is required and what > >would be the repercussions? > If you ask me, it is because the compiler for Apache Flex should be > marking SWFs as created by Apache Flex, not Adobe Flex. Could it bust > some analytics? I suppose so, but we are not affiliated with Adobe so we > shouldn't be marking SWFs that way. > Any chance this could break third party tools like automation, etc? Thanks, Om > > > >Thanks, > >Om > > > > > > > >> -Alex > >> > >> > >
