If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect
that to cause conflicts?
On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you
> throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of Apache
> Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains, if
> you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency.
> Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like.
>
> The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the Flex
> RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you
> visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a SWZ was
> loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as an
> application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to download
> it again.
>
> The reason for you having to explicitly list every dependency that Needs a
> non-Default scope, is mavens inability to overload scopes. So the framworks
> master pom has normal dependencies to it's libs and if you simply reference
> that, you wouldn't utilize the shared-lib concept of RSLs but use normal
> SWCs for compilation, resulting in a way bigger Output file. So if you want
> to migrate your Project to Apache Flex you have to replace every Caching
> scope with "rsl".
>
> Chris
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mscharp [michael.sch...@fmr.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:03
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>
> Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't
> say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project.
>
> So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of
> the FDK you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone
> tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it having to
> do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM
> source code.
>
> As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed,
> and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex
> applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously in our
> pom files we had:
>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>charts</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>rpc</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> <artifactId>mx</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>spark</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>caching</scope>
> </dependency>
>
> Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms.
> I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as
> standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a
> lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms.
> So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not. If I
> do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like
> this?
>
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>
> <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
>
> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>rsl</scope>
> </dependency>
>
> Again, thanks everyone for the help.
>
> Michael
>
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [via Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
> ml-node+s2333347n29584...@n4.nabble.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM
> To: Scharp, Michael
> Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>
> Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl"
> and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files
> from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls
> have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz
> files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the
> testsuite to fail.
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45
> An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1>
> Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>
> Hi,
>
> > This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files).
> Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are
> just not signed.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html
> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==
> >.
> NAML<
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
