I forgot to mention that from what I can see everything looks correct, so I'm guessing there is some small typo or something. brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would try doing a text comparison between your pom and the one > posted here, and see if it catches anything. > I'd do it for you, but outside my git commitsI don't have a good text > comparison tool. > > http://stackoverflow.com/a/18713810/787202 > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > and the number 47 > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, mscharp <michael.sch...@fmr.com> wrote: >> Thanks Avi, here is what I have defined for the dependencies in my build >> tag, are there more/different dependencies I need to set? >> >> <dependencies> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>${flex.groupId}</groupId> >> <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> >> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> <type>pom</type> >> </dependency> >> </dependencies> >> >> Thanks >> >> From: Avi Kessner [via Apache Flex Development] >> [mailto:ml-node+s2333347n29608...@n4.nabble.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:32 AM >> To: Scharp, Michael >> Subject: RE: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> getAdvancedTelemetry() >> >> You need to overide /set the dependencies in the plugin inside the build >> tags >> On 13 Sep 2013 08:35, "mscharp" <[hidden >> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=0>> wrote: >> >>> I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM. >>> I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm >>> seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against >>> 4.10.0.20130801? >>> >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is missing, >>> no dependency information available >>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >>> missing, no dependency information available >>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >>> missing, no dependency information available >>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >>> missing, no dependency information available >>> Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is >>> missing, no dependency information available >>> Downloading: >>> https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/compiler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201 >>> is missing, no dependency information available >>> >>> I can post poms if it helps. >>> >>> On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I >>> have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them >>> if needed. >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=1> [via >>> Apache Flex Development] [mailto: >>> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=2>] >>> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM >>> To: Scharp, Michael >>> Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> getAdvancedTelemetry() >>> >>> I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-) >>> >>> Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think >>> that would be a good idea. >>> If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be >>> possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if you are >>> talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest not >>> to try that. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=0>] >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24 >>> An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=1> >>> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> getAdvancedTelemetry() >>> >>> If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect >>> that to cause conflicts? >>> On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=2>" <[hidden >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=3>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you >>> > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of >>> Apache >>> > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains, >>> if >>> > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency. >>> > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like. >>> > >>> > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the Flex >>> > RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you >>> > visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a SWZ >>> was >>> > loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as an >>> > application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to >>> download >>> > it again. >>> > >>> > The reason for you having to explicitly list every dependency that Needs >>> a >>> > non-Default scope, is mavens inability to overload scopes. So the >>> framworks >>> > master pom has normal dependencies to it's libs and if you simply >>> reference >>> > that, you wouldn't utilize the shared-lib concept of RSLs but use normal >>> > SWCs for compilation, resulting in a way bigger Output file. So if you >>> want >>> > to migrate your Project to Apache Flex you have to replace every Caching >>> > scope with "rsl". >>> > >>> > Chris >>> > >>> > >>> > ________________________________________ >>> > Von: mscharp [[hidden >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=4>] >>> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:03 >>> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=5> >>> > Betreff: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry() >>> > >>> > Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't >>> > say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project. >>> > >>> > So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of >>> > the FDK you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone >>> > tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it having >>> to >>> > do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM >>> > source code. >>> > >>> > As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed, >>> > and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex >>> > applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously in our >>> > pom files we had: >>> > >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>charts</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> <artifactId>mx</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>spark</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>caching</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > >>> > Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms. >>> > I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as >>> > standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a >>> > lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms. >>> > So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not. If I >>> > do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like >>> > this? >>> > >>> > <dependency> >>> > >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> > >>> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId> >>> > >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> > <type>swc</type> >>> > <scope>rsl</scope> >>> > </dependency> >>> > >>> > Again, thanks everyone for the help. >>> > >>> > Michael >>> > >>> > From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=6> [via >>> Apache Flex Development] [mailto: >>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=7>] >>> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM >>> > To: Scharp, Michael >>> > Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry() >>> > >>> > Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" >>> > and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different >>> files >>> > from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed >>> rsls >>> > have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz >>> > files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the >>> > testsuite to fail. >>> > >>> > Chris >>> > >>> > ________________________________________ >>> > Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden >>> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>] >>> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45 >>> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1> >>> > Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry() >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > > This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files). >>> > Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are >>> > just not signed. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Justin >>> > ________________________________ >>> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >>> > below: >>> > >>> > >>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html >>> > To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here< >>> > >. >>> > NAML< >>> > >>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > View this message in context: >>> > >>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html >>> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >>> below: >>> >>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29598.html >>> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >>> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here< >>> >. >>> NAML< >>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29601.html >>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> ________________________________ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> below: >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29608.html >> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and >> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click >> here<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==>. >> NAML<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29611.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
