While technically you are right, no-one uses the source distribution of the installer, so I think it is very important the binaries are tested properly.
EdB On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > IMO, if the source package is the same, a new vote is not needed. > > On 10/22/13 11:31 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Weird. I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine. But not in my >>IDE. So, I recreated the binaries. Now the problem is gone. My best >>guess is that I built the windows binary with a stale copy of the >>codebase. >> >>Should I make a new RC2 and put up a new vote. Or should I update RC1 >>with >>the new binaries and ask folks to re-test? >> >>Anyone has a preference? >> >>Thanks, >>Om >> >> >>On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:38 AM, piotr.zarzycki >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Thanks Maurice. Now I've got correct version osmf. :) >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Flex/Air developer open to new job offers and challenges. >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> >>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Flex- >>>SDK-Installer-2-7-Release-RC1-tp31365p31394.html >>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>>Nabble.com. >>> > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
