On 10/22/13 11:39 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>While technically you are right, no-one uses the source distribution >of the installer, so I think it is very important the binaries are >tested properly. I agree the new binaries need to be tested, but I don't think a new RC is required, especially if you are right and folks don't use the source distro. Why make the few of us who do source kit verification go through all that again? Just have some folks pound on the binaries and call it done when they're happy. > >EdB > > > >On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> IMO, if the source package is the same, a new vote is not needed. >> >> On 10/22/13 11:31 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Weird. I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine. But not in >>>my >>>IDE. So, I recreated the binaries. Now the problem is gone. My best >>>guess is that I built the windows binary with a stale copy of the >>>codebase. >>> >>>Should I make a new RC2 and put up a new vote. Or should I update RC1 >>>with >>>the new binaries and ask folks to re-test? >>> >>>Anyone has a preference? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Om >>> >>> >>>On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:38 AM, piotr.zarzycki >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Maurice. Now I've got correct version osmf. :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Flex/Air developer open to new job offers and challenges. >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> >>>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Fle >>>>x- >>>>SDK-Installer-2-7-Release-RC1-tp31365p31394.html >>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>>>Nabble.com. >>>> >> > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
