1. Interesting to hear that. Never got that impression before. 2. I was thinking of scout, the gaming sdk, FB, brackets, webfonts, and phonegap. 3. Yeah, I don't understand it :-) On 28 Oct 2013 20:34, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Well, I'm an Adobe employee, but not an official spokesperson, so the > following is just my personal opinion. > > 1) I'm not sure your claims of making no profit is accurate > 2) I'm not sure what "developer tools" you are referring to, but Adobe is > definitely all about creatives these days. > 3) FlexJS still uses FB and FP at development time, but otherwise, I'm > trying to get you off of the Adobe stack too ;-) > > -Alex > > On 10/28/13 10:29 AM, "Avi Kessner" <akess...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >About this whole Flash/Actionscript/Flex debacle. They destroyed customer > >relations, while continuing to build up the flash player. They make things > >open source, while making the ability to consume it proprietary, and yet > >make no profit from that proprietary technology. (yes I'm aware about the > >licensing issues, but that seems like something that could be worked > >around > >in one way or another) They buy great web technologies, but then make it > >impossible to integrate them into Flash. They build developer tools, but > >then advertise to "artists" instead of "developers". Their actions have > >caused me to want to abandon them as quickly as possible, and that can't > >be > >smart. I went from regularly talking to 20-30 people about Adobe > >products, > >to maybe 5. > > > >brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > >and the number 47 > > > > > >On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> OK, I'll bite. Stupid about what? > >> > >> On 10/28/13 7:04 AM, "Avi Kessner" <akess...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Why is adobe being so stupid? That's all I have to wonder... > >> > > >> >brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > >> >and the number 47 > >> > > >> > > >> >On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Maurice Amsellem < > >> >maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Look at the source code of this page. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > http://www.areweflashyet.com/shumway/examples/inspector/inspector.html?rf > >> >>ile=../Box2DFlashAS3/demo.swf > >> >> > >> >> Interesting... > >> >> > >> >> Maurice > >> >> > >> >> -----Message d'origine----- > >> >> De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] > >> >> Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 14:36 > >> >> À : dev@flex.apache.org > >> >> Objet : RE: Mozilla takes on Flash > >> >> > >> >> Hi Sebastian, > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for sharing the link. > >> >> > >> >> I believe this is more of a competitor to FlexJS, although Shumway > >>seems > >> >> more aimed at Flash SWFs. > >> >> > >> >> It would be interesting to make comparisons between the two, in > >>terms of > >> >> performance , even if they are not at the same level of completion. > >> >> > >> >> Maurice > >> >> > >> >> -----Message d'origine----- > >> >> De : Sebastian Mohr [mailto:flex.masul...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi > >>28 > >> >> octobre 2013 14:17 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Mozilla takes on > >> >>Flash > >> >> > >> >> Does anyone have an idea what this [1] means to us? > >> >> > >> >> [1] > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/10/mozilla-takes-on-flash/?goback=%2 > >> >>Egde_4296888_member_5797420905202204675#%21 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Sebastian (PMC) > >> >> Interaction Designer > >> >> > >> >> Looking for a Login > >> >> Example<http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample>with > >> >> Apache Flex? This guy loves ... Flash Catalyst CS5.5, the > >> >> Designer&Developer Workflow and Design Tools for Apache Flex ... > >>What do > >> >> you love? > >> >> > >> > >> > >
