One followup question: Do we know for sure that Installer 2.7 fixed up the RSL versions? I am not seeing any code that does that. Could I have deleted it by accident?
I'll try it myself tomorrow. -Alex On 3/15/14 12:36 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >On 3/14/14 11:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>> I'm not sure what "Latest SDK" means. Is that the nightly? Did you >>> install it into Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit? >>Latest develop branch. >Sorry, I'm still confused. If it is the latest develop branch, how is the >installer involved? > >> >>> What were you running when you got this error? Ant on some build.xml? >>> Which one? >>ant in the air_for_ant directory. >I was about to guess that. The README for the installer says you have to >specify AIR_HOME when building ant_on_air, was it set to some older >version of AIR SDK? It won't pick the AIR SDK out of the SDK specified by >FLEX_HOME. So if you specify AIR_HOME as an AIR 4.0 SDK and then the >build works then this is not an installer issue. > >However, I did notice the README is not quite correct. The ant_on_air >build does not use FLEX_HOME_WIN and FLEX_HOME_MAC, the installer build >does. I will fix the README. It looks like the README is not in the >source package. Did we fix a README issue for the SDK or Installer once >without doing another RC or is another RC required? > >> >>> Crap. I guess I did not understand how this part of the install was >>> supposed to work. This is a bug in the install script for 4.12, not >>>the >>> installer. >>This only happens when you use the new installer - so that basically >>means we can release the new installer until we fix the config file and >>release 4.12.1. >> >>There should be a way to make them independent of each other and avoid >>this - any ideas? >They are independent. Other than downloading the binary package, >verifying the MD5, and uncompressing, the rest of the install >responsibilities are in the package, not the installer. I suspect if you >actually use Ant to run the installer.xml you'll have the same problem. I >know the temptation is to change the installer, but if we ever get the >installer out there, we'll be glad in the future that (hopefully) any >other SDK or FlexJS install issue can be fixed in the SDK and FlexJS >installer.xmls so we only vote on one package and not try to coordinate >two votes and two packages in the future. > >> >>>> -Issue with 4.11 RSL in flex-config.xml >>> More details please? >>As discussed before that are incorrect and have 0 as the build number. >Rats, looks like I missed that before. I'll have a look in my morning. > >Thanks, >-Alex >
