On 3/24/14 5:07 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> IMO, the Adobe code is a third-party work as defined here: >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party > >Note that in this case I believe it would fall under: >"5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with on >a case-by-case basis by the PMC." It wasn't clear that the PMC had total authority. I figured it meant we should get some advice from legal-discuss. > >Not this: >"4. Minor modifications/additions to third-party source files should >typically be licensed under the same terms as the rest of the rest of the >third-party source for convenience." > >So it's really up to us to decide but if you want to drag legal into it >go ahead. Well, the thing I don't understand is, that this is a collection of files some of which were changed significantly, but some not. So then which rules apply? That's what I want to find out. > >> In the meantime, those files should probably retain the Adobe copyright >>and BSD header. > >See 4 vs 5 above. IMO the headers don't need to change. > >Thanks, >Justin
