I'm confused.  What should we add to the LICENSE given the font is under
AL?

My script helped me notice that Open Sans is in the source package and I
wondered about the "take" policy and whether it should be bundled or not,
but I don't see how that affects LICENSE.

-Alex

On 6/17/14 3:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>-1 (binding)
>
>LICENCE is missing mention of the OpenSans font that is included in the
>source package. [1] [2]
>
>While this is "minor", and I know we've missed this in previous releases,
>is it important that we get the LICENSE file corrrect.
>
>Justin
>
>PS I found this by manually running rat and checking the LICENSE file.
>
>1. http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Open+Sans
>2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps

Reply via email to