I'm confused. What should we add to the LICENSE given the font is under AL?
My script helped me notice that Open Sans is in the source package and I wondered about the "take" policy and whether it should be bundled or not, but I don't see how that affects LICENSE. -Alex On 6/17/14 3:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >-1 (binding) > >LICENCE is missing mention of the OpenSans font that is included in the >source package. [1] [2] > >While this is "minor", and I know we've missed this in previous releases, >is it important that we get the LICENSE file corrrect. > >Justin > >PS I found this by manually running rat and checking the LICENSE file. > >1. http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Open+Sans >2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
