Why does it need setter/getter? E4X is all functions isn’t it? Yeah. JSON is generally a better way to go, but some APIs are still XML and then there’s manipulation of XML documents (which I tend to do a lot of…)
On Jul 3, 2014, at 7:53 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > I took a quick look a while back. Required getter/setter support in the > browser. And then the remaining question: will it perform? It is similar > to the AMF question. Doable, but may not be faster than switching to JSON. > > -Alex > > On 7/3/14 9:48 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone looked into writing a js library to copy the functionality of >> E4X? >> >> It seems to me that at least 90% of E4X could be pretty easily replicated >> in a js libraryŠ >> >> Besides namespaces, the only thing that seems hard to me is complex >> selectors. >> >> On Jul 2, 2014, at 7:53 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> FWIW, FlexJS is eventually going to need to find a way to warn folks >>> about >>> use of E4X >> >
