Hi Erick, Nice introduction, I just wanted to ask, it is written "Any issues found should be fixed - preferably by the reporter - and committed to the 'release' branch", why not fix on the dev branch and cherry picked onto the release one avoiding a merge back to the dev branch ? A nice article too [1] btw !
Frédéric THOMAS [1] http://producingoss.com/fr/stabilizing-a-release.html > From: e...@ixsoftware.nl > Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:19:34 +0100 > Subject: Re: The 'less-RC' process explained > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Excellent idea. I've added it to the Wiki text. > > EdB > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > I’m ok with it too. I would like to see a specific subject tag for the > > way the RM "makes his intention” known. How about [LAST CALL]? That > > would make it stand out from the usual email traffic. > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 12/1/14, 10:26 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> > > wrote: > > > >>+1 > >> > >>Looks like it's doable and shows similarities to other development > >>projects I have seen. But with a lot less steps. > >> > >>-Mark > >> > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] > >>Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 5:07 AM > >>To: dev@flex.apache.org > >>Subject: The 'less-RC' process explained > >> > >>Hi, > >> > >>I've put an initial draft for an explanation of the 'less-RC' process > >>into the Wiki: > >> > >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2oH0Ag > >> > >>Please take a look and see if that properly summarizes the previous > >>discussions we've had. > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>EdB > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Ix Multimedia Software > >> > >>Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>3521 VB Utrecht > >> > >>T. 06-51952295 > >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
