Very true, indeed, but.... does that mean that from version 5 onwards, FB won't work anymore? Would we have to buy (or hire) another IDE?
Dany > Op 9-dec.-2014, om 19:27 heeft Jesse Nicholson <ascensionsyst...@gmail.com> > het volgende geschreven: > > "Although I don't think we should be bending over backwards for an IDE that > is now from our standpoint 3rd Party. Especially since it's not being > updated." > > +10 to that > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J < > mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: > >> Although I don't think we should be bending over backwards for an IDE that >> is now from our standpoint 3rd Party. Especially since it's not being >> updated. >> >> >> -Mark >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:03 AM >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Next version of Flex SDK >> >> I thought so too. >> >> Tom >> >> On 08/12/14 20:37, Erik de Bruin wrote: >>> Didn't Alex find that the current FB requires the leading 4? >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Jesse Nicholson
