Shouldn't we make it as easy as possible for folks get BlazeDS, if we want them to use it? If so, then it would sure help to have everything in one zip, along with examples.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/13/14, 4:31 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >So if you guys haven't got any objections, I would try starting the > >release process. > >But I would initiate the Maven release and not use the Ant stuff. > > No objections from me, and I don’t think it matters to me whether you use > Maven or Ant, but I’m wondering: > > 1) Are there enough BlazeDS customers who will need the Ant stuff to work > for some reason. > 2) Whether the BlazeDS customers will want a non-Maven way of getting all > of the jars, like in one zip. > 3) Whether the BlazeDS customers will expect a WAR and/or other old > Adobe-style packaging with Tomcat and various example apps. > > I changed the subject on this thread in hopes of getting feedback from > folks. I can try to help with the Ant stuff if folks really want it. > > -Alex > > > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ http://portfolio.cottage14.com http://annapolisndp.ca
