Maybe we offer it via a Mavel release for those that want to build from source, and offer a binary download. That should take care of both major use cases, I think.
-Nick On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/13/14, 4:31 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >So if you guys haven't got any objections, I would try starting the > >release process. > >But I would initiate the Maven release and not use the Ant stuff. > > No objections from me, and I don’t think it matters to me whether you use > Maven or Ant, but I’m wondering: > > 1) Are there enough BlazeDS customers who will need the Ant stuff to work > for some reason. > 2) Whether the BlazeDS customers will want a non-Maven way of getting all > of the jars, like in one zip. > 3) Whether the BlazeDS customers will expect a WAR and/or other old > Adobe-style packaging with Tomcat and various example apps. > > I changed the subject on this thread in hopes of getting feedback from > folks. I can try to help with the Ant stuff if folks really want it. > > -Alex > > >
