On 6/9/15, 3:29 PM, "Peter Ginneberge" <p.ginnebe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I don't know which classes end up in which swc, but the same rule may >apply >for Spark only projects in which case Spark classes extending mx ones may >be a >no no as well. Good point. In this case the mx Sort and Sort field are already in the framework.swc. Justin’s point about differences in behavior are the most important point. But maybe it is possible to find a way to factor out the common pieces and share them. -Alex
