> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > I just got it to work for me.
Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error 3003, just tried again and had the same issue. Forgive me if I missed something though. Frédéric THOMAS ---------------------------------------- > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +0000 > > OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > I just got it to work for me. > > -Alex > > On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> +1 Binding >> >>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 >> >>Thanks >>Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >>---------------------------------------- >>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>> >>> +1 Binding >>> >>> What a great script ! >>> >>> approve: >>> ���� [echo] >>> ���� [echo] +1 >>> ���� [echo] Package >>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex >>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>> ���� [echo] Java 1.7 >>> ���� [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >>> ���� [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >>> ���� [echo] Source kit builds: y >>> ���� [echo] README is ok: y >>> ���� [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>> ���� [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >>> ���� [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >>> ���� [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>> ���� [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >>> ���� [echo] >>> >>> main: >>> >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Fr�d�ric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------- >>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> >>>> +1 Binding >>>> >>>> Source compiles fine >>>> Signatures match >>>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it >>>>>does, >>>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary >>>>>convenience >>>>> utility, it gets my vote. >>>>> >>>>> EdB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting >>>>>>send. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> Package >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl >>>>>ex-s >>>>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>>>>> Java 1.7 >>>>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>>>>> Source kit signatures match: y >>>>>> Source kit builds: y >>>>>> README is ok: y >>>>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>>>> NOTICE is ok: y >>>>>> LICENSE is ok: y >>>>>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>>>> No unapproved binaries: y >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >>>>>>>released. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective >>>>>>>platforms, >>>>>>>are available here: >>>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binarie >>>>>>>s >>>>>>> >>>>>>>As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Before voting please review the sections: >>>>>>>What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >>>>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >>>>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>>>>>> >>>>>>>For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that >>>>>>>automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. >>>>>>>It will: >>>>>>> - download the default source package for your OS (use >>>>> -Dpackage.suffix >>>>>>>to override) >>>>>>> - run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in >>>>>>>your >>>>>>>path) >>>>>>> - uncompress the source package >>>>>>> - install and run rat >>>>>>> - display the rat report and ask you to verify >>>>>>> - display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify >>>>> the >>>>>>>non-AL files >>>>>>> - display the README and ask you to verify >>>>>>> - display the RELEASE_NOTES and ask you to verify >>>>>>> - display the NOTICE and ask you to verify >>>>>>> - display the LICENSE and ask you to verify >>>>>>> - run the build and any tests run by the build. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You should be able to go away for a while during the build. When it >>>>>>>is >>>>>>>finished, it will display information to be copied into the vote >>>>>>>thread. >>>>>>>You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the >>>>> packages >>>>>>>and build results are always encouraged. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>To use this script (assuming you have Ant installed), it should be as >>>>>>>simple as: >>>>>>>- Create an empty folder >>>>>>>- Download ApproveInstaller.xml into that folder from: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ApproveIn >>>>>sta >>>>>>>l >>>>>>>ler.xml >>>>>>> >>>>>>>- Run: ant -e -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Vote >>>>>>>[ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>>Alex Harui >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>> >>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>> >>> >> >