Ok, sorry, I got it !!
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:03:17 +0100
>
>> Try the -keep-asdoc flag on MXMLJSC.
>
> Actually, it is what I did, I tried to compile the asjs project Core/as to js
> hoping to get the same result than what I can see in Core/js
>
> What it doesn't compiler the same ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
>> have 1.9 in AS
>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:53:56 +0000
>>
>> Try the -keep-asdoc flag on MXMLJSC. But the deal is that none of these
>> .as or .js files factor into the final app since they are all externs so
>> <inject_html> won’t be seen.
>>
>> So yes, folks can use conditional compile to add stuff, but requiring a
>> base class may be easier for the developers. Anyway, we’ll find out when
>> more people use it.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/24/15, 10:12 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
>>>> automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
>>>> org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in the
>>>> script being added to the head.
>>>>
>>>> This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or
>>>>wrong.
>>>> Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
>>>> encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to guess
>>>> up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
>>>
>>>
>>>This is true it is a bit edge case, only for externs based applications
>>>at the moment, it could become less true if want to use conditional
>>>compilation for framework components too IMO and let the creator build it
>>>in one shot, in 2 shots, he could still modify the generated JS to
>>>include the <inject_html> though.
>>>
>>>Btw,
>>> I had a look at the Closure Compiler Externs Extractor [1] but the
>>>result of the extracted lib [2] doesn't show any type annotations, I
>>>guess this is normal but I wonder how those google externs like this one
>>>[3] have been built ?
>>>
>>>Another thing, why when I cross compile IStand, I don't have the comments
>>>generated like:
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * addBead()
>>> *
>>> * @expose
>>> * @param {org_apache_flex_core_IBead} bead The bead to add.
>>> */
>>>
>>>I've got that only:
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * org.apache.flex.core.IStrand
>>> *
>>> * @fileoverview
>>> *
>>> * @suppress {checkTypes}
>>> */
>>>
>>>goog.provide('org_apache_flex_core_IStrand');
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * @interface
>>> */
>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand = function() {
>>>};
>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
>>>};
>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
>>>function(classOrInterface) {
>>>};
>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.removeBead = function(bead) {
>>>};
>>>
>>>
>>>/**
>>> * Metadata
>>> *
>>> * @type {Object.<string, Array.<Object>>}
>>> */
>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>[1] http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/Externs/
>>>[2] http://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.4.js
>>>[3]
>>>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/closure-compiler/master/contrib/e
>>>xterns/angular-1.3.js
>>>
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------
>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>>>>we now have 1.9 in AS
>>>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:59:45 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/23/15, 10:03 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it's cool, it simplified my life as well as being able to modify
>>>>>the
>>>>>html head from AS, for example here with the dynamic loading of the
>>>>>jQuery lib but it seems I'm the only one happy with that :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>No interests to add such feature to the framework though ?
>>>>
>>>> I’m not opposed to it. IMO, injecting Jquery’s scripts should be
>>>> automatic. It is in the FlexJS Jquery.swc because you subclass
>>>> org.apache.flex.jquery.Application and that automatically results in the
>>>> script being added to the head.
>>>>
>>>> This externs-based swc concept is too new to know what is right or
>>>>wrong.
>>>> Just keep on coding and we’ll see repeating patterns emerge and
>>>> encapsulate them. Folks will try it and like it or not. No need to guess
>>>> up front. Thanks for figuring it out.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
