On Jan 8, 2016 9:17 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > I've been wondering if there should be a "Client" track as an umbrella for > both Flex and Cordova talks. Especially since FlexJS Mobile is output via > Cordova. If folks think that's a good idea I will hit up the Cordova > folks I know to see what they think.
+1 for a Client track. Although we will be doing not just FlexJS, but also Flex web and Flex Mobile (which is kinda like a competitor to Cordova) Apache Wicket might be a good target as well. Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 1/8/16, 1:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >A track makes it easier to get at least enough talks for the track > >selected. Without a track it has to sort of fit into another track. > >Depending on how they cut the tracks this could be difficult. We we want > >to go for a track, I could re-submit updated versions of my last > >submissions regarding BlazeDS and FlexJS support in Maven. > > > >But my stomach sort of tells me that it could be difficult to get a track > >as the attendee numbers weren't great last time. That's why I was > >intending on submitting something Flexy under the hood of a different > >track (After all ... the (mobile) frontend and backend (BlazeDS) will be > >Apache Flex) ;-) > > > >If we want a track, I could try to take care of this ... but only if > >there is interest in this ... I remember feeling left a little alone with > >the content at first for ApacheCon EU last time (Thanks to Justin and Om > >it wasn't a big problem though :-) ) > > > >Chris > > > >________________________________________ > >Von: omup...@gmail.com <omup...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash > >Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > >Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 00:57 > >An: dev@flex.apache.org > >Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics? > > > >On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 1/7/16, 3:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > >> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending > >>on > >> >what others are doing. > >> > > >> >Should we ask for a Flex track here as well? > >> > >> Don't we have to have a track to get Flex sessions accepted at all? > >> > > > >Not necessarily. If we have a track, there is a better chance of Flex > >talks being accepted. If we don't, then it is up in the air as to which > >ones get selected. At least, that's the impression I got from the > >ApacheCon EU selection process. > > > > > >> > >> You seem a bit more interested in the JS.swc usage. Do you want to do a > >> session on that? > >> > > > >Sure, that would be fun. We need to come up with a cool name for 'JS.swc > >usage'. We have been lumping everything under FlexJS, which seems wrong. > > > >It would be nice if someone else did a talk on Flex Mobile. Any takers? > >You don't have to be a committer or a PMC member to give a talk. > > > >Thanks, > >Om > > > > > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> >
