I've submitted my talk: "Object Oriented Programming for the Web using
Apache FlexJS".

Thanks,
Om

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> I submitted my "FlexJS:  Apache's Structured Language, Cross-platform
> Solution for Clients" session.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 2/8/16, 1:19 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> >Ok ... so I just submitted two talks:
> >
> >- Building FlexJS applications with Maven
> >- Controlling Cyborgs with Apache Flex
> >
> >Don't forgett to post yours :-)
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >
> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
> >Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2016 00:34
> >An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >Betreff: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
> >
> >Well I currently lay a lot of emphasis on the Ecmascript 4 factor.
> >Current JavaScript being EcmaScript 3.0 or 3.1 (which was renamed to 5.0
> >but has no real changes in it). Sort of "Write Ecmascript 4 without
> >breaking the internet" cause this was the major reason for not going down
> >the 4.0 road and that's exactly what we are doing now ... writing
> >Ecmascript 4 code having it cross compiled to 3.1 alias 5.0. I think its
> >worth mentioning this.
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >________________________________________
> >Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016 19:24
> >An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
> >
> >On 2/4/16, 1:47 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>The organiser it more likely to pick talks that are topical, dare I say
> >>fashionable, and will attract an audience so it does matter somewhat.
> >>They I believe make the final selection.
> >
> >What buzz words do we think are topical or fashionable?  Or maybe
> >controversial?
> >
> >I'm thinking of changing the title of my talk to include "cross-platform".
> > So maybe:
> >"FlexJS:  Apache's Structured Language, Cross-platform Solution for
> >Clients"
> >
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >-Alex
> >
>
>

Reply via email to