I submitted my "FlexJS: Apache's Structured Language, Cross-platform Solution for Clients" session.
-Alex On 2/8/16, 1:19 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >Ok ... so I just submitted two talks: > >- Building FlexJS applications with Maven >- Controlling Cyborgs with Apache Flex > >Don't forgett to post yours :-) > >Chris > > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] >Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2016 00:34 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics? > >Well I currently lay a lot of emphasis on the Ecmascript 4 factor. >Current JavaScript being EcmaScript 3.0 or 3.1 (which was renamed to 5.0 >but has no real changes in it). Sort of "Write Ecmascript 4 without >breaking the internet" cause this was the major reason for not going down >the 4.0 road and that's exactly what we are doing now ... writing >Ecmascript 4 code having it cross compiled to 3.1 alias 5.0. I think its >worth mentioning this. > >Chris > >________________________________________ >Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016 19:24 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics? > >On 2/4/16, 1:47 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: >> >>The organiser it more likely to pick talks that are topical, dare I say >>fashionable, and will attract an audience so it does matter somewhat. >>They I believe make the final selection. > >What buzz words do we think are topical or fashionable? Or maybe >controversial? > >I'm thinking of changing the title of my talk to include "cross-platform". > So maybe: >"FlexJS: Apache's Structured Language, Cross-platform Solution for >Clients" > > >Thoughts? >-Alex >
