Point taken.

I’ll spend some time today and see if I can figure it out. If I have trouble, I 
might come back and ask you for help… ;-)

On Feb 16, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2/15/16, 11:44 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I would definitely work on this if I knew how. My level of expertise
>> using ant is about good enough to look at a build file and get a general
>> idea of how it works.
> 
> Before Flex came to Apache, I didn't know much about Ant either.  We had
> folks who did that sort of stuff at Adobe.  But  I was forced to learn it.
> You're a smart guy, you could learn it too if motivated enough.
> 
> But, because you are a volunteer and your time is limited, I guess that
> gives you the right to say, "well, if it isn't as easy as I want it to be,
> I can't contribute".  And that puts the onus on the few of us who have
> more time to do the not-so-fun stuff.  Which isn't fun.  Which is why I'm
> complaining.  Like or not, this stuff is the bleeding edge.  I really
> don't see much advantage to the community to polish stuff that might
> change soon.  I had hoped we could draw in more folks who could put up
> with the bleeding edge, but apparently we can't.  Folks can just say "I
> don't want to know how you work, this is how I want to work" and I have to
> try to figure out what the difference is and try to get the build system
> to conform to it.
> 
>> 
>> The Flex builds seem really complex to me and I’m not even sure what all
>> the dependencies are.
> 
> Agreed that it is complex.  I could probably stop developing new features
> and try to make it simpler.  The README and LICENSE hopefully document the
> dependencies.
> 
> -Alex
> 

Reply via email to