Currently you have to manually download the FlashPlayer and set an environment variable to the executable, I want to automate that so all you have to do, is update the version of the playerglobal dependency and the corresponding FlashPlayer is used automatically. Removing the need to setup anything in order to build the FlexJS SDK
Chris ________________________________________ Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> Gesendet: Samstag, 16. April 2016 22:06 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff On Apr 16, 2016 12:00 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > If they want me to change something, I guess I do ... At least I understood it that way, that they want us to change something.and I want to automate the Flash Player provisioning, so I guess they will have to be involved :-( What is Flash Player provisioning and how does it involve the Apache Flex project? Thanks, Om > > Chris > > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> > Datum: 16.04.16 19:13 (GMT+01:00) > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: AW: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff > > On Apr 16, 2016 12:16 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Well I have to agree with Justin ... up till now I know that there will > be changes and I know they will directly affect me as I will have to adjust > the "mavenizer" to respect these changes. It would be good to know if it's > just the texts, that have to be changed, or it the process has to be > changed. So it would be good to know what has to be changed ... don't want > to dig through commits in order to find out what I have to change. > > I'm sure Alex will give you all that information. Do you really need > Adobe legal team to get involved here? > > Thanks, > Om > > > > > Chris > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> im Auftrag von OmPrakash > Muppirala <[email protected]> > > Gesendet: Samstag, 16. April 2016 07:05 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff > > > > On Apr 15, 2016 5:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Are you asking Alex to reveal what he discussed internally? > > > > > > Up to him. For change like this I like to see someone from Adobe Legal > > send to the dev or private list requesting the changes to be made. That > way > > we have a clear email trail. I’m guessing that probably won’t happen. Meh > / > > whatever. > > > > Still don't get your point. What difference does it make if Alex posts > it > > or someone from Adobe legal team posts? > > > > > > > > > The way I see it, it was Alex with his Adobe hat on making this post > on > > the > > > > Apache Flex dev list. It doesn't get more transparent that that. > > > > > > There should be no Adobe hats on this list at all. Companies are not > > members of Apache communities, individuals are. [1][2] > > > > You asked Adobe legal to post on this list. How do you square that with > > this? > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > > > > 1. http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html#corporate-membership < > > http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html#corporate-membership> > > > 2. http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats < > > http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats> > > > > > >
