Well I have to agree with Justin ... up till now I know that there will be changes and I know they will directly affect me as I will have to adjust the "mavenizer" to respect these changes. It would be good to know if it's just the texts, that have to be changed, or it the process has to be changed. So it would be good to know what has to be changed ... don't want to dig through commits in order to find out what I have to change.
Chris ________________________________________ Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> Gesendet: Samstag, 16. April 2016 07:05 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff On Apr 15, 2016 5:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Are you asking Alex to reveal what he discussed internally? > > Up to him. For change like this I like to see someone from Adobe Legal send to the dev or private list requesting the changes to be made. That way we have a clear email trail. I’m guessing that probably won’t happen. Meh / whatever. Still don't get your point. What difference does it make if Alex posts it or someone from Adobe legal team posts? > > > The way I see it, it was Alex with his Adobe hat on making this post on the > > Apache Flex dev list. It doesn't get more transparent that that. > > There should be no Adobe hats on this list at all. Companies are not members of Apache communities, individuals are. [1][2] You asked Adobe legal to post on this list. How do you square that with this? Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html#corporate-membership < http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html#corporate-membership> > 2. http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats < http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats> > >
