That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not confuse our users.
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, Phoenix is already a thing: > http://phoenixframework.org/ <http://phoenixframework.org/> > > Not sure about trademark issues… > >> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. >> Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) >> >> Thanks, >> Om >
