I think the name thing should be in a separate thread.

Mike

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:

> That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not
> confuse our users.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well, Phoenix is already a thing:
> > http://phoenixframework.org/ <http://phoenixframework.org/>
> >
> > Not sure about trademark issues…
> >
> >> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork.
> >> Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix.  You know what that means :-)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >
>
>

Reply via email to