I would stay away from WordPress just because of all the security issues and maintenance required.
Github pages should be a better place. Thanks, Om On Sep 20, 2017 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Hmm. > > I think if we grab a domain and donate it to the ASF, that it can't be > hosted on non-ASF hardware. That would need to be verified. > Maybe it would be better for the Royale PMC to approve Royale.xx as a > third-party domain under Carlos's control. I think that's allowed. The > policy [1] says that "in general" it is NOT allowed, but "in general" > implies it isn't a hard and fast rule. > > IMO, things under the PMC's control have certain obligations. It has to > be sustainable by "anyone". How many folks know how to edit WordPress > themes? I don't. I always choose one of their default themes. It might > have to be hosted or host-able by Apache Infra, and I don't know if they > are ok with WordPress. > > Personally, I want to be able to stick FlexJS apps in our web presence. > Honestly, I'd actually like to see our entire web presence be built in > FlexJS. It would truly be "eating our own dog food". Yes, I know that > mostly static pages aren't a great match for FlexJS/Royale, but in the > end, shouldn't all of our web presence be dynamic? > > My 2 cents, > -Alex > > [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/domains.html > > On 9/20/17, 10:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > wrote: > > >Hi Alex, > > > >that's my bet. To make a good website I proposed to make it in Wordpress > >since is what I have some expertise in that field (If I'm the person in > >charge to make it happen). All the team can as well have an account in the > >WP dash board to be able to post and share content in a easy way. > > > >WP will gave as the landing and some pages that would be useful for > >convenience. But I think, as well, to link directly to the resources in > >the > >apache infrastructure in the main menu of the site just as we do now > >(code, > >GitHub, wiki, links to our mailing lists, releases, binaries, and so on) > > > >For domain registration I'd prefer .io since is very popular today, but > >.as > >seems ok for me as well. > >I think Erik proposed to register the domain for us, so I think is ok for > >me that he makes the registration. Maybe we could do it as soon as the > >board approve the new TLP and name. > > > >I can host the site in CO servers with the rest of our websites, to > >support > >as well this change and initiative. Again I'll be waiting for board > >approval to start working. I'm assuming here that you guys trust me to > >make > >this website and branding work, of course. > > > >So maybe we could make a thread to select from Royale.io and Royale.as, > >and > >of course if price for .io is very high we could go with .as if it's more > >low. > > > > > > > > > >2017-09-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > >> Hi Carlos, > >> > >> We can go grab some royale.<xxx> domains. Apache will have some rules > >> about what can go on them. At the worst it will have to be a straight > >> redirect to royale.apache.org, but I think we might be able to have at > >> least a landing page. I think the goal is that Apache wants strong > >> association with a project's web presence. Even on a royale.foo landing > >> page, the first mention of Royale probably has to be "Apache Royale". > >> > >> But also, I am hopeful we will be using GitBox and thus GitHub will be > >>our > >> hub of activity. And I think we should use GitHub pages and build a > >>solid > >> web presence there, again within Apache's rules. > >> > >> Royale.io is for sale. We could ask what the price is. > >> Royale.as appears to be unregistered. > >> > >> My 2 cents, > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 9/20/17, 8:31 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos > >>Rovira" > >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >as Alex and Dave said, we should wait for board approval. > >> > > >> >@Harbs, I was using "xxx" to refer to "whatever domain extension out > >>there > >> >that would fit for us" ;) > >> > > >> >@Dave, I understand that we should use the apache domain for the > >>service > >> >apache provide (i.e: store code, mailing list, releases...), but as > >>many > >> >other projects out there, I suppose we should as well have an external > >> >tools or domains that serve our purpose. In the same way we have some > >> >external servers or tools actually. > >> >For example, we could have a cool name domain that points to a website > >>and > >> >there refer to the apache resources. If that option should go against > >> >apache rules, that would be strange for me, and would certainly be > >> >hopeless > >> >to work in and organization with such limitations. > >> > > >> >Thanks > >> > > >> > > >> >2017-09-20 16:44 GMT+02:00 Tomislav Pokrajcic <tomis...@svemir.net>: > >> > > >> >> Guys, congrats for selecting the new project name. > >> >> Still not sure how Royale resonates with me, but like it much more > >>than > >> >> the 1st runner up. > >> >> Non English speakers would pretty often confuse beads with beds and > >>job > >> >> ads might sound strange. > >> >> Just imagine: > >> >> "Looking for an amazing Beads expert to join our team." > >> >> :) > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> > >> >> Tom > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 20.9.2017. 15:45, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> As an Apache project the domain would be: > >> >>> > >> >>> Royale.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> I can write a long discussion about policy later but there are > >>reasons, > >> >>> requirements, approvals around use of other domains. > >> >>> > >> >>> I know everyone is enthusiastic but let's get approved by the board > >> >>>first. > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Dave > >> >>> > >> >>> Sent from my iPhone > >> >>> > >> >>> On Sep 20, 2017, at 6:33 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > >>wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> * Domain: We must find a good and simple domain for Royale. I think > >>if > >> >>>we > >> >>>>> can find something short like "royale.XXX" would be great over > >> >>>>> "apacheroyale.XXX". > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> .com, .org, .net, .io etc. all seem to be either in use or > >>squatted > >> >>>> upon. > >> >>>> Am I forgetting memorable TLP extensions? I assume we don't want > >> >>>>anything > >> >>>> like 'royale.foundation' or any fancy extensions like that, right? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Are we considering extended names, like 'royaleframework' as well? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I can register anything we decide and sponsor until a foundation > >>takes > >> >>>> over > >> >>>> and then transfer the domain. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> EdB > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -- > >> >>>> Ix Multimedia Software > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >> >>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >> >>>> > >> >>>> T. 06-51952295 > >> >>>> I. > >> >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> > >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > www.ixsoftware.nl&data > >>=02%7C01%7C%7C7a1bad633d124870d72508d5004968f3% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 > >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415237653639659&sdata= > J8Fnfl9NYUdUQgb2JolOElSQf3AmV > >>dxhNX8TeGpE1II%3D&reserved=0&da > >> >>>>ta=02%7C01%7C%7Cab05fef4543644f67e2c08d5003c > >> ad9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > >> >>>>d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415182976392829&sdata= > >> LDQFlmzgCBkY3NyhB%2BZ1W > >> >>>>bJnC6FcmPRRXhB7Ltggre8%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> > > >> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeo > >> >scopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab05fef4543644f67e2c08d5003c > >> ad9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b > >> >34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415182976392829& > >> sdata=snzdFt3cDT4GcWGa > >> >NJF3dFIfdKedU5jF%2FBM1XqrkQHY%3D&reserved=0> > >> > > >> >Carlos Rovira > >> > > >> >Director General > >> > > >> >M: +34 607 22 60 05 > >> > > >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeos > >> >copic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab05fef4543644f67e2c08d5003c > >> ad9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3 > >> >4438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415182976392829& > >> sdata=snzdFt3cDT4GcWGaN > >> >JF3dFIfdKedU5jF%2FBM1XqrkQHY%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avant2 > >> >.es&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab05fef4543644f67e2c08d5003c > >> ad9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3443879 > >> >4aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415182976392829&sdata= > >> 8SXVcRe3E%2FLVCSIODbbnL > >> >wsN3AIsG4djE9F0VhpX8H0%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> > > >> >Conocenos en 1 minuto! > >> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be > >> >%2FP2IEAYDG5HU&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cab05fef4543644f67e2c08d5003c > >> ad9e%7Cfa7b1b > >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415182976392829& > >> sdata=%2FWlOcenx8I > >> >qTu2PYyD%2FBiChaLHKstZC0eLlmb5gpmng%3D&reserved=0> > >> > > >> > > >> >Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede > >>contener > >> >información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje > >>por > >> >error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma > >>vía y > >> >proceda a su destrucción. > >> > > >> >De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le > >> >comunicamos > >> >que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es > >>CODEOSCOPIC > >> >S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > >> >servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > >> >rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a > >> >nuestras > >> >oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > >> >necesaria. > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > > > ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeo > >scopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7a1bad633d124870d72508d50049 > 68f3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b > >34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415237653639659& > sdata=3TVBQ1FBx7N0zaeD > >gNrxg80zei0XQWTnUtNwJqD5xps%3D&reserved=0> > > > >Carlos Rovira > > > >Director General > > > >M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeos > >copic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7a1bad633d124870d72508d50049 > 68f3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3 > >4438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415237653639659& > sdata=3TVBQ1FBx7N0zaeDg > >Nrxg80zei0XQWTnUtNwJqD5xps%3D&reserved=0 > > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avant2 > >.es&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7a1bad633d124870d72508d50049 > 68f3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3443879 > >4aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415237653639659&sdata= > g8k6t3Kn7Hv1VhuuhhIK0xV > >QTvVgOh4WcNU0LiAL1S0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > >Conocenos en 1 minuto! > ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be > >%2FP2IEAYDG5HU&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7a1bad633d124870d72508d50049 > 68f3%7Cfa7b1b > >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636415237653639659& > sdata=OZzBDygty6bK > >flTfL4%2Bfr6Bt5huzu%2BX6QxrJFc0hOEw%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > >Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > >información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > >error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > >proceda a su destrucción. > > > >De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le > >comunicamos > >que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > >S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > >servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > >rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a > >nuestras > >oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > >necesaria. > >
