Any chance to cherry-pick this also into 1.2.1? We're usign Flink 1.2.0 in
production and maybe an upgrade to 1.2.1 would be a safer option in the
short term..

Best,
Flavio

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Ah, I see. The fix for that has been merged into master so it will be
> release in Flink 1.3.
>
> > On 28. Apr 2017, at 13:50, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, you're right Aljosha..the issue number is correct, the link is
> > wrong! The correct one is https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/FLINK-6398
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think there might be a typo. We haven’t yet reached issue number 6389,
> >> if I’m not mistaken. The latest as I’m writing this is 6410.
> >>
> >>> On 28. Apr 2017, at 10:00, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If it's not a problem it will be great for us to include also
> FLINK-6398
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6938> if it's not a big
> >> deal
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Flavio
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Zhuoluo Yang <
> >> zhuoluo....@alibaba-inc.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Devs,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for the release plan.
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you also please add the feature FLINK-6196
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6196> Support dynamic
> >> schema
> >>>> in Table Function?
> >>>> I’d like to update the code as comments left on PR today.
> >>>> I will try to make sure the code is updated before the Apr 30th.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Zhuoluo 😀
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 在 2017年4月28日,上午8:48,Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for starting this thread. It would be great to see the
> following
> >>>> features available in Flink 1.3:
> >>>>
> >>>> * Support for complex schema: FLINK-6033, FLINK-6377
> >>>> * Various improvements on SQL over group windows: FLINK-6335,
> FLINK-6373
> >>>> * StreamTableSink for JDBC and Cassandra: FLINK-6281, FLINK-6225
> >>>> * Decoupling Flink and Hadoop: FLINK-5998
> >>>>
> >>>> All of them have gone through at least one round of review so I'm
> >>>> optimistic that they can make it to 1.3 in a day or two.
> >>>>
> >>>> Additionally it would be great to see FLINK-6232 go in, but it depends
> >> on
> >>>> FLINK-5884 so it might be a little bit tough.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Haohui
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing completion,
> but
> >>>> with only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really short.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it
> >>>> allows the modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good i
> >> think.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Chesnay
> >>>>
> >>>> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Ufuk,
> >>>>    I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics reporter)
> >>>>
> >>>> into
> >>>>
> >>>> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Bowen
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) <
> >>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Ufuk,
> >>>> Thank you for launching this topic!
> >>>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider (
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>
> >>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337)  to be included in 1.3 and most of the jobs
> can
> >>>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help of
> >>>>
> >>>> your
> >>>>
> >>>> reviews this week.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,Zhijiang---------------------------------------------
> >>>> ---------------------发件人:Ufuk
> >>>>
> >>>> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间:2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人:dev <
> >>>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送:Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主
> >>>> 题:[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze
> >>>> Hey devs! :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming 1.3
> >>>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st.
> >>>>
> >>>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the current
> >>>> state of things.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;)
> >>>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that
> >>>> have not been merged yet?
> >>>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an
> >>>> important feature?
> >>>>
> >>>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in the
> >>>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release
> >>>> manager (@Robert?).
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>>
> >>>> Ufuk
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to