Hi Flavio, I have also fix the issue in 1.2 branch, but the next release will be 1.2.2
Best, Kurt On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Flavio: > Have you seen this (w.r.t. 1.2.1) ? > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Flink/VkLeQejxLg24Lk0D1?subj=+ > RESULT+VOTE+Release+Apache+Flink+1+2+1+RC2+ > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> > wrote: > > > Any chance to cherry-pick this also into 1.2.1? We're usign Flink 1.2.0 > in > > production and maybe an upgrade to 1.2.1 would be a safer option in the > > short term.. > > > > Best, > > Flavio > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Ah, I see. The fix for that has been merged into master so it will be > > > release in Flink 1.3. > > > > > > > On 28. Apr 2017, at 13:50, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry, you're right Aljosha..the issue number is correct, the link is > > > > wrong! The correct one is https://issues.apache.org/ > > > jira/browse/FLINK-6398 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > aljos...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I think there might be a typo. We haven’t yet reached issue number > > 6389, > > > >> if I’m not mistaken. The latest as I’m writing this is 6410. > > > >> > > > >>> On 28. Apr 2017, at 10:00, Flavio Pompermaier < > pomperma...@okkam.it> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> If it's not a problem it will be great for us to include also > > > FLINK-6398 > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6938> if it's not a > big > > > >> deal > > > >>> > > > >>> Best, > > > >>> Flavio > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Zhuoluo Yang < > > > >> zhuoluo....@alibaba-inc.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi Devs, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks for the release plan. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Could you also please add the feature FLINK-6196 > > > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6196> Support > dynamic > > > >> schema > > > >>>> in Table Function? > > > >>>> I’d like to update the code as comments left on PR today. > > > >>>> I will try to make sure the code is updated before the Apr 30th. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Zhuoluo 😀 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 在 2017年4月28日，上午8:48，Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hello, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks for starting this thread. It would be great to see the > > > following > > > >>>> features available in Flink 1.3: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> * Support for complex schema: FLINK-6033, FLINK-6377 > > > >>>> * Various improvements on SQL over group windows: FLINK-6335, > > > FLINK-6373 > > > >>>> * StreamTableSink for JDBC and Cassandra: FLINK-6281, FLINK-6225 > > > >>>> * Decoupling Flink and Hadoop: FLINK-5998 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> All of them have gone through at least one round of review so I'm > > > >>>> optimistic that they can make it to 1.3 in a day or two. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Additionally it would be great to see FLINK-6232 go in, but it > > depends > > > >> on > > > >>>> FLINK-5884 so it might be a little bit tough. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards, > > > >>>> Haohui > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM Chesnay Schepler < > > ches...@apache.org > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hello, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing > completion, > > > but > > > >>>> with only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really > > short. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it > > > >>>> allows the modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good > i > > > >> think. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards, > > > >>>> Chesnay > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hi Ufuk, > > > >>>> I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics > reporter) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> into > > > >>>> > > > >>>> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Bowen > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < > > > >>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hi Ufuk, > > > >>>> Thank you for launching this topic! > > > >>>> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider ( > > > >>>> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/ > > > >>>> > > > >>>> jira/browse/FLINK-6337) to be included in 1.3 and most of the > jobs > > > can > > > >>>> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help > > of > > > >>>> > > > >>>> your > > > >>>> > > > >>>> reviews this week. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Cheers,Zhijiang--------------------------------------------- > > > >>>> ---------------------发件人：Ufuk > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间：2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人：dev < > > > >>>> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送：Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主 > > > >>>> 题：[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze > > > >>>> Hey devs! :-) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming > > 1.3 > > > >>>> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the > > current > > > >>>> state of things. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;) > > > >>>> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that > > > >>>> have not been merged yet? > > > >>>> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an > > > >>>> important feature? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in > the > > > >>>> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release > > > >>>> manager (@Robert?). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Best, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Ufuk > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
