IMHO, any release that improves things and does not break anything is worth releasing and should not be blocked on bugs that it did not cause. There will always be a next (minor/major) release that may fix this at a later time, given that the time between releases is not too high.
Consider someone waiting for a bugfix/feature that made it into 1.3.0 who--if delayed--would have to wait even longer for "his" bugfix/feature. Any new bugfixes (and there will always be more) can wait a few more days or even a few weeks and may be fixed in 1.3.1 or so. Nico On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:21:41 CEST Till Rohrmann wrote: > - Not sure whether it's a good argument to defer fixing major bugs because > they have not been introduced with 1.3.0. It's actually alarming that these > things have not been found earlier given that we test our releases > thoroughly.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
