Just FYI, the MapRFileSystem does have some additional code on our 
(Hadoop)FileSystem class, so it might not be straightforward to use MapR with 
our vanilla HadoopFileSystem.

(Still staying that we should remove it, though).

Aljoscha

> On 29. Jul 2019, at 15:16, Simon Su <barley...@163.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 to remove it.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> SImon
> 
> 
> On 07/29/2019 21:00,Till Rohrmann<trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 to remove it.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:27 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 to remove it
> 
> One should still be able to use MapR in the same way as any other vendor
> Hadoop distribution.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:22 PM JingsongLee
> <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote:
> 
> +1 for removing it. We never run mvn clean test success in China with
> mapr-fs...
> Best, Jingsong Lee
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com>
> Send Time:2019年7月29日(星期一) 12:05
> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the flink-mapr-fs module
> 
> +1 for removing it.
> 
> Actually I encountered this issue several times. I thought it might be
> blocked by firewall of China :(
> 
> BTW, I think it should be included in release notes.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:37 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
> If we remove it, that would mean it’s not supported in Flink 1.9.0,
> yes.
> Or we only remove it in Flink 1.10.0.
> 
> Aljoscha
> 
> On 29. Jul 2019, at 11:35, Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Aljoscha,
> 
> Does it mean the MapRFileSystem is no longer supported since 1.9.0?
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:19 PM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:06 AM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> +1 to remove it.
> 
> Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2019年7月29日周一 下午5:01写道:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Because of recent problems in the dependencies of that module [1]
> I
> would
> suggest that we remove it. If people are using it, they can use
> the
> one
> from Flink 1.8.
> 
> What do you think about it? It would a) solve the dependency
> problem
> and
> b) make our build a tiny smidgen more lightweight.
> 
> Aljoscha
> 
> [1]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/16c16db8f4b94dc47e638f059fd53be936d5da423376a8c1092eaad1@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Best Regards
> 
> Jeff Zhang
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to