This has been fixed in master and 1.9, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13499

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:28 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:

> I will open a PR later today, changing the module to use reflection rather
> than a hard MapR dependency.
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 6:40 AM Rong Rong <walter...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We've also experienced some issues with our internal JFrog artifactory. I
>> am suspecting some sort of mirroring problem but somehow it only occur to
>> the mapr-fs module.
>> So +1 to remove.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:47 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > It should be fairly straightforward to rewrite the code to not have a
>> MapR
>> > dependency.
>> > Only one class from the MapR dependency is ever referenced, and we could
>> > dynamically load that class.
>> >
>> > That way we can drop the dependency without dropping the support.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Just FYI, the MapRFileSystem does have some additional code on our
>> > > (Hadoop)FileSystem class, so it might not be straightforward to use
>> MapR
>> > > with our vanilla HadoopFileSystem.
>> > >
>> > > (Still staying that we should remove it, though).
>> > >
>> > > Aljoscha
>> > >
>> > > > On 29. Jul 2019, at 15:16, Simon Su <barley...@163.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 to remove it.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > SImon
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 07/29/2019 21:00,Till Rohrmann<trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > > +1 to remove it.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:27 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 to remove it
>> > > >
>> > > > One should still be able to use MapR in the same way as any other
>> > vendor
>> > > > Hadoop distribution.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:22 PM JingsongLee
>> > > > <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 for removing it. We never run mvn clean test success in China
>> with
>> > > > mapr-fs...
>> > > > Best, Jingsong Lee
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > From:Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com>
>> > > > Send Time:2019年7月29日(星期一) 12:05
>> > > > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
>> > > > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the flink-mapr-fs module
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 for removing it.
>> > > >
>> > > > Actually I encountered this issue several times. I thought it might
>> be
>> > > > blocked by firewall of China :(
>> > > >
>> > > > BTW, I think it should be included in release notes.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:37 PM Aljoscha Krettek <
>> aljos...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > If we remove it, that would mean it’s not supported in Flink 1.9.0,
>> > > > yes.
>> > > > Or we only remove it in Flink 1.10.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > Aljoscha
>> > > >
>> > > > On 29. Jul 2019, at 11:35, Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi Aljoscha,
>> > > >
>> > > > Does it mean the MapRFileSystem is no longer supported since 1.9.0?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:19 PM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:06 AM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 to remove it.
>> > > >
>> > > > Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2019年7月29日周一 下午5:01写道:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Because of recent problems in the dependencies of that module [1]
>> > > > I
>> > > > would
>> > > > suggest that we remove it. If people are using it, they can use
>> > > > the
>> > > > one
>> > > > from Flink 1.8.
>> > > >
>> > > > What do you think about it? It would a) solve the dependency
>> > > > problem
>> > > > and
>> > > > b) make our build a tiny smidgen more lightweight.
>> > > >
>> > > > Aljoscha
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/16c16db8f4b94dc47e638f059fd53be936d5da423376a8c1092eaad1@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Best Regards
>> > > >
>> > > > Jeff Zhang
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to