+1. Thanks Hequn On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:39 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for resuming the discussion Hequn. +1 for starting with the RC > creation. Thanks for driving the release process! > > Cheers, > Till > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:02 PM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Cool, looking forward the first RC of release 1.9.2. > > > > Best, > > Jincheng > > > > > > Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月21日周二 下午10:02写道： > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Considering that we are on the finishing line for release-1.10.0 and > that > > > there are no blockers for release-1.9.2, I'm proposing to resume this > > > discussion. > > > If there are no more concerns or any critical issues for releasing > > 1.9.2, I > > > would like to create the first RC soon :) > > > > > > Best, > > > Hequn > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:10 PM Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Till, > > > > > > > > I agree with your concerns and thanks a lot for your feedback! > > > > > > > > In fact, I also have those concerns. The reasons I started the > DISCUSS > > > are: > > > > - Considering the low capacities, I want to start the discussion > > earlier > > > > so that we can have more time to collect information and planning for > > the > > > > release. Usually, it takes a couple of weeks to address the blockers. > > > > - The blockers of 1.9.2 are probably also blockers for 1.10.0, take > > > > FLINK-15266 as an example. I can help to drive to solve the problem > so > > > that > > > > 1.10.0 can also benefit from it. > > > > > > > > However, to ease the load, we can vote after Christmas if there are > no > > > > more blockers at that time. > > > > There is a chance that the 1.10 blocker resolution has calmed down a > > bit. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Hequn > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:05 PM Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Jincheng, > > > >> > > > >> Yes, your help would be very helpful. Thanks a lot! > > > >> > > > >> Best, Hequn > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:52 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Hequn, > > > >>> > > > >>> thanks for starting this discussion. In general I think it is a > good > > > idea > > > >>> to release often. Hence, I also believe it is time for another bug > > fix > > > >>> release for 1.9. > > > >>> > > > >>> The thing I'm wondering is whether we are stretching our resources > a > > > bit > > > >>> too much if we now start with a 1.9.2 release vote because of the > > > ongoing > > > >>> 1.10 release testing work. My concern is that we don't have the > > > >>> capacities > > > >>> to properly test the 1.9 RC. Additionally, many people will be on > > > >>> Christmas > > > >>> vacations during the next 2 weeks. If this is it not a problem and > we > > > >>> have > > > >>> enough resources for a parallel release then we can start it. > > Otherwise > > > >>> I'd > > > >>> say that we wait until the 1.10 blocker resolution has calmed down > a > > > bit. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Till > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:47 AM jincheng sun < > > sunjincheng...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > Thanks for bring up the discussion Hequn. I would like to give > you > > a > > > >>> hand > > > >>> > at the last stage when the RC is finished.(If you need) :) > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Best, > > > >>> > Jincheng > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Best, > > > >>> > Jincheng > > > >>> > @sunjincheng121 <https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月18日周三 下午3:44写道： > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Hi everyone, > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > It has already been two months since we released the Flink > 1.9.1. > > > >>> > > We already have many important bug fixes from which our users > can > > > >>> benefit > > > >>> > > in the release-1.9 branch (85 resolved issues). > > > >>> > > Therefore, I propose to create the next bug fix release for > Flink > > > >>> 1.9. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Most notable fixes are: > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > - [FLINK-14074] MesosResourceManager can't create new > > taskmanagers > > > in > > > >>> > > Session Cluster Mode. > > > >>> > > - [FLINK-14995] Kinesis NOTICE is incorrect > > > >>> > > - [FLINK-15013] Flink (on YARN) sometimes needs too many slots > > > >>> > > - [FLINK-15036] Container startup error will be handled out > side > > of > > > >>> the > > > >>> > > YarnResourceManager's main thread > > > >>> > > - [FLINK-14315] NPE with JobMaster.disconnectTaskManager > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Furthermore, there is one issue marked as blocker for 1.9.2 > which > > > >>> should > > > >>> > be > > > >>> > > merged before 1.9.2 release: > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > - [FLINK-15266] NPE in blink planner code gen (reviewing) > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > If there are any other blocker issues need to be fixed in > 1.9.2, > > > >>> please > > > >>> > let > > > >>> > > me know. > > > >>> > > I will kick off the release process once blocker issues have > been > > > >>> merged. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > It would be very appreciated if there is any PMC can help with > > the > > > >>> final > > > >>> > > steps of the release process. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Best, > > > >>> > > Hequn > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >
