+1 (binding) - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully - checked/verified signatures and hashes - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified web ui and log output, nothing unexpected - started cluster and run some e2e sql queries, all of them works well and the results are as expected: - read from kafka source, aggregate, write into mysql - read from kafka source with watermark defined in ddl, window aggregate, write into mysql - read from kafka with computed column defined in ddl, temporal join with a mysql table, write into kafka
Cheers, Jark On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 19:23, Kurt Young <k...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - verified signatures and checksums > - start local cluster, run some examples, randomly play some sql with sql > client, no suspicious error/warn log found in log files > - repeat above operation with both scala 2.11 and 2.12 binary > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 6:38 PM Yang Wang <danrtsey...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > - Building from source with all tests skipped > > - Build a custom image with 1.10-rc3 > > - K8s tests > > * Deploy a standalone session cluster on K8s and submit multiple jobs > > * Deploy a standalone per-job cluster > > * Deploy a native session cluster on K8s with/without HA configured, > > kill TM and jobs could recover successfully > > > > > > Best, > > Yang > > > > Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月10日周一 下午4:29写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) Thanks for driving this, Gary & Yu. > > > > > > > > > There is an unfriendly error here: "OutOfMemoryError: Direct buffer > > memory" > > > in FileChannelBoundedData$FileBufferReader. > > > > > > It forces our batch users to configure > > > "taskmanager.memory.task.off-heap.size" in production jobs. And users > are > > > hard to know how much memory they need configure. > > > > > > Even for us developers, it is hard to say how much memory, it depends > on > > > tasks left over from the previous stage and the parallelism. > > > > > > > > > It is not a blocker, but hope to resolve it in 1.11. > > > > > > > > > - Verified signatures and checksums > > > > > > - Maven build from source skip tests > > > > > > - Verified pom files point to the 1.10.0 version > > > > > > - Test Hive integration and SQL client: work well > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Jingsong Lee > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:28 PM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > My bad. The missing commit info is caused by building from the src > code > > > zip > > > > which does not contain the git info. > > > > So this is not a problem. > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) for rc3 > > > > Here's what's were verified : > > > > * built successfully from the source code > > > > * run a sample streaming and a batch job with parallelism=1000 on > yarn > > > > cluster, with the new scheduler and legacy scheduler, the job runs > well > > > > (tuned some resource configs to enable the jobs to work well) > > > > * killed TMs to trigger failures, the jobs can finally recover from > > the > > > > failures > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > > > Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月10日周一 上午12:31写道： > > > > > > > > > The commit info is shown as <unknown> on the web UI and in logs. > > > > > Not sure if it's a common issue or just happens to my build only. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Zhu Zhu > > > > > > > > > > aihua li <liaihua1...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月9日周日 下午7:42写道： > > > > > > > > > >> Yes, but the results you see in the Performance Code Speed Center > > [3] > > > > >> skip FLIP-49. > > > > >> The results of the default configurations are overwritten by the > > > latest > > > > >> results. > > > > >> > > > > >> > 2020年2月9日 下午5:29，Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks for the efforts Aihua! These could definitely improve our > > RC > > > > >> test coverage! > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Just to confirm, that the stability tests were executed with the > > > same > > > > >> test suite for Alibaba production usage, and the e2e performance > one > > > was > > > > >> executed with the test suite proposed in FLIP-83 [1] and > FLINK-14917 > > > > [2], > > > > >> and the result could also be observed from our performance > > code-speed > > > > >> center [3], right? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Best Regards, > > > > >> > Yu > > > > >> > > > > > >> > [1] > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-83%3A+Flink+End-to-end+Performance+Testing+Framework > > > > >> < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-83%3A+Flink+End-to-end+Performance+Testing+Framework > > > > >> > > > > > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14917 < > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14917> > > > > >> > [3] https://s.apache.org/nglhm <https://s.apache.org/nglhm> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 11:20, aihua li <liaihua1...@gmail.com > > > <mailto: > > > > >> liaihua1...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > >> > +1 (non-binging) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I ran stability tests and end-to-end performance tests in branch > > > > >> release-1.10.0-rc3,both of them passed. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Stability test: It mainly checks The flink job can revover from > > > > >> various abnormal situations which concluding disk full, > > > > >> > network interruption, zk unable to connect, rpc message timeout, > > > etc. > > > > >> > If job can't be recoverd it means test failed. > > > > >> > The test passed after running 5 hours. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > End-to-end performance test: It containes 32 test scenarios > which > > > > >> designed in FLIP-83. > > > > >> > Test results: The performance regressions about 3% from 1.9.1 if > > > uses > > > > >> default parameters; > > > > >> > The result: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > if skips FLIP-49 (add > > > parameters:taskmanager.memory.managed.fraction: > > > > >> 0,taskmanager.memory.flink.size: 1568m in flink-conf.yaml), > > > > >> > the performance improves about 5% from 1.9.1. The result: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I confirm it with @Xintong Song < > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~xintongsong> that > the > > > > >> result makes sense. > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> 2020年2月8日 上午5:54，Gary Yao <g...@apache.org <mailto: > > g...@apache.org > > > >> > > > > >> 写道： > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Hi everyone, > > > > >> >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the > > version > > > > >> 1.10.0, > > > > >> >> as follows: > > > > >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > > >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific > > > comments) > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which > > > > includes: > > > > >> >> * JIRA release notes [1], > > > > >> >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience > > > releases > > > > >> to be > > > > >> >> deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], > which > > > are > > > > >> signed with the key with > > > > >> >> fingerprint BB137807CEFBE7DD2616556710B12A1F89C115E8 [3], > > > > >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository > > [4], > > > > >> >> * source code tag "release-1.10.0-rc3" [5], > > > > >> >> * website pull request listing the new release and adding > > > > announcement > > > > >> blog > > > > >> >> post [6][7]. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > > > > majority > > > > >> >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Thanks, > > > > >> >> Yu & Gary > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> [1] > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12345845 > > > > >> < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12345845 > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> [2] > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.10.0-rc3/ > > > < > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.10.0-rc3/> > > > > >> >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS < > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS> > > > > >> >> [4] > > > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1333 > > > > < > > > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1333 > > > > > > >> >> [5] > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.10.0-rc3 > > > > < > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.10.0-rc3> > > > > >> >> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/302 < > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/302> > > > > >> >> [7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/301 < > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/301> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best, Jingsong Lee > > > > > >
