+1 (non-binding)

- build from source
- start standalone cluster, and run some examples
- played with sql-client with some simple sql
- run tests in IDE
- run some sqls running in 1.9 internal version with 1.10.0-rc3, seems 1.10
behaves well.

Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月10日周一 下午8:13写道:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - build from source (with tests)
> - run nightly e2e tests
> - run example jobs in local/standalone/yarn setups
> - play around with memory configurations on local/standalone/yarn setups
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 7:55 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
> > - checked/verified signatures and hashes
> > - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified
> web
> > ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> > - started cluster and run some e2e sql queries, all of them works well
> and
> > the results are as expected:
> >   - read from kafka source, aggregate, write into mysql
> >   - read from kafka source with watermark defined in ddl, window
> aggregate,
> > write into mysql
> >   - read from kafka with computed column defined in ddl, temporal join
> with
> > a mysql table, write into kafka
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jark
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 19:23, Kurt Young <k...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > - verified signatures and checksums
> > > - start local cluster, run some examples, randomly play some sql with
> sql
> > > client, no suspicious error/warn log found in log files
> > > - repeat above operation with both scala 2.11 and 2.12 binary
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 6:38 PM Yang Wang <danrtsey...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >  +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Building from source with all tests skipped
> > > > - Build a custom image with 1.10-rc3
> > > > - K8s tests
> > > >     * Deploy a standalone session cluster on K8s and submit multiple
> > jobs
> > > >     * Deploy a standalone per-job cluster
> > > >     * Deploy a native session cluster on K8s with/without HA
> > configured,
> > > > kill TM and jobs could recover successfully
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Yang
> > > >
> > > > Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月10日周一 下午4:29写道:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding) Thanks for driving this, Gary & Yu.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There is an unfriendly error here: "OutOfMemoryError: Direct buffer
> > > > memory"
> > > > > in FileChannelBoundedData$FileBufferReader.
> > > > >
> > > > > It forces our batch users to configure
> > > > > "taskmanager.memory.task.off-heap.size" in production jobs. And
> users
> > > are
> > > > > hard to know how much memory they need configure.
> > > > >
> > > > > Even for us developers, it is hard to say how much memory, it
> depends
> > > on
> > > > > tasks left over from the previous stage and the parallelism.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not a blocker, but hope to resolve it in 1.11.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Verified signatures and checksums
> > > > >
> > > > > - Maven build from source skip tests
> > > > >
> > > > > - Verified pom files point to the 1.10.0 version
> > > > >
> > > > > - Test Hive integration and SQL client: work well
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jingsong Lee
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:28 PM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > My bad. The missing commit info is caused by building from the
> src
> > > code
> > > > > zip
> > > > > > which does not contain the git info.
> > > > > > So this is not a problem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding) for rc3
> > > > > > Here's what's were verified :
> > > > > >  * built successfully from the source code
> > > > > >  * run a sample streaming and a batch job with parallelism=1000
> on
> > > yarn
> > > > > > cluster, with the new scheduler and legacy scheduler, the job
> runs
> > > well
> > > > > > (tuned some resource configs to enable the jobs to work well)
> > > > > >  * killed TMs to trigger failures, the jobs can finally recover
> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > > failures
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Zhu Zhu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月10日周一 上午12:31写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The commit info is shown as <unknown> on the web UI and in
> logs.
> > > > > > > Not sure if it's a common issue or just happens to my build
> only.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Zhu Zhu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > aihua li <liaihua1...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月9日周日 下午7:42写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Yes, but the results you see in the Performance Code Speed
> > Center
> > > > [3]
> > > > > > >> skip FLIP-49.
> > > > > > >>  The results of the default configurations are overwritten by
> > the
> > > > > latest
> > > > > > >> results.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > 2020年2月9日 下午5:29,Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks for the efforts Aihua! These could definitely improve
> > our
> > > > RC
> > > > > > >> test coverage!
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Just to confirm, that the stability tests were executed with
> > the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > >> test suite for Alibaba production usage, and the e2e
> performance
> > > one
> > > > > was
> > > > > > >> executed with the test suite proposed in FLIP-83 [1] and
> > > FLINK-14917
> > > > > > [2],
> > > > > > >> and the result could also be observed from our performance
> > > > code-speed
> > > > > > >> center [3], right?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > > > > >> > Yu
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > [1]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-83%3A+Flink+End-to-end+Performance+Testing+Framework
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-83%3A+Flink+End-to-end+Performance+Testing+Framework
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14917 <
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14917>
> > > > > > >> > [3] https://s.apache.org/nglhm <https://s.apache.org/nglhm>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 11:20, aihua li <
> liaihua1...@gmail.com
> > > > > <mailto:
> > > > > > >> liaihua1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binging)
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I ran stability tests and end-to-end performance tests in
> > branch
> > > > > > >> release-1.10.0-rc3,both of them passed.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Stability test: It mainly checks The flink job can revover
> > from
> > > > > > >> various abnormal situations which concluding disk full,
> > > > > > >> > network interruption, zk unable to connect, rpc message
> > timeout,
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > > >> > If job can't be recoverd it means test failed.
> > > > > > >> > The test passed after running 5 hours.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > End-to-end performance test: It containes 32 test scenarios
> > > which
> > > > > > >> designed in FLIP-83.
> > > > > > >> > Test results: The performance regressions about 3% from
> 1.9.1
> > if
> > > > > uses
> > > > > > >> default parameters;
> > > > > > >> > The result:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >  if skips FLIP-49 (add
> > > > > parameters:taskmanager.memory.managed.fraction:
> > > > > > >> 0,taskmanager.memory.flink.size: 1568m in flink-conf.yaml),
> > > > > > >> >  the performance improves about 5% from 1.9.1. The result:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I confirm it with @Xintong Song <
> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/~xintongsong>
> that
> > > the
> > > > > > >> result  makes sense.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> 2020年2月8日 上午5:54,Gary Yao <g...@apache.org <mailto:
> > > > g...@apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 写道:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >> >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
> > > > version
> > > > > > >> 1.10.0,
> > > > > > >> >> as follows:
> > > > > > >> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > >> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > > > comments)
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> which
> > > > > > includes:
> > > > > > >> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > >> >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > > > > releases
> > > > > > >> to be
> > > > > > >> >> deployed to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2],
> > > which
> > > > > are
> > > > > > >> signed with the key with
> > > > > > >> >> fingerprint BB137807CEFBE7DD2616556710B12A1F89C115E8 [3],
> > > > > > >> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > Repository
> > > > [4],
> > > > > > >> >> * source code tag "release-1.10.0-rc3" [5],
> > > > > > >> >> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > > > > > announcement
> > > > > > >> blog
> > > > > > >> >> post [6][7].
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> by
> > > > > > majority
> > > > > > >> >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> >> Yu & Gary
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> [1]
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12345845
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12345845
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> [2]
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.10.0-rc3/
> > > > > <
> > > > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.10.0-rc3/>
> > > > > > >> >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> <
> > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS>
> > > > > > >> >> [4]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1333
> > > > > > <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1333
> > > >
> > > > > > >> >> [5]
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.10.0-rc3
> > > > > > <
> > > > > > >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.10.0-rc3
> > >
> > > > > > >> >> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/302 <
> > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/302>
> > > > > > >> >> [7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/301 <
> > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/301>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best, Jingsong Lee
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 

Benchao Li
School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
Tel:+86-15650713730
Email: libenc...@gmail.com; libenc...@pku.edu.cn

Reply via email to