Thanks you all for the quick fix. I will prepare the first RC soon.

Thanks,
Dian

> 在 2020年7月15日,上午5:55,Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> 写道:
> 
> FLINK-18573 is fixed.
> 
> I agree with delaying FLINK-18581; updating the JDK seems like a reasonable 
> thing to do.
> 
> That said, there's a larger discussion to be had on our compatibility stance 
> regarding JDK versions, and how we can better safeguard against such issues 
> (i.e., forcing a very specific JDK version on CI).
> 
> On 14/07/2020 05:29, Dian Fu wrote:
>> Thanks Jark and Xintong for the investigation of this problem. I'm fine to 
>> not include FLINK-18581 in 1.11.1 considering that there are workaround and 
>> it requires some time to come out with a proper fix. @Chesnay, what's your 
>> thought?
>> 
>> An update of the other issues:
>> - FLINK-17075: Add task status reconciliation between TM and JM  (confirmed 
>> with @Chesnay that it will not be included in 1.11.1)
>> - FLINK-18477: ChangelogSocketExample does not work  (Fixed)
>> - FLINK-18573: influxdb metrics report broken (PR available, under review)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dian
>> 
>>> 在 2020年7月13日,下午8:26,Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the updates, Jark.
>>> 
>>> + 1 for not blocking 1.11.1 with FLINK-18581.
>>> 
>>> - The workaround requires upgrading to a later version of JDK8. I believe
>>> such minor version migration should be acceptable in most cases.
>>> - The original effort is contributed by Andrey & Till, both on vacation at
>>> the moment.
>>> - I've taken a brief look at the original efforts [1] [2]. It seems they
>>> are already sort of quick fixes. I would be in favor of spending some time
>>> looking for a proper solution, rather than patching a temporal solution
>>> over another temporal solution.
>>> 
>>> Thank you~
>>> 
>>> Xintong Song
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15758
>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17822
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:01 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> After discussing FLINK-18581 with @Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 
>>>> offline,
>>>> it seems that it doesn't need to block 1.11.1.
>>>> Because users can switch to use another version of JDK as a workaround.
>>>> Besides, this might not be a trivial issue, we may need more time to come
>>>> up with a clean solution and check compatibility problems for other JDK
>>>> versions.
>>>> Therefore, I suggest downgrading the priority of FLINK-18581, and not
>>>> block 1.11.1 release.
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think? @Dian Fu <dia...@apache.org> , @Chesnay Schepler
>>>> <ches...@apache.org> , @Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jark
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 18:16, Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks! It makes sense to include FLINK-18573 and FLINK-18581 in 1.11.1.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 在 2020年7月13日,下午5:52,Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> 写道:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It would be good to fix FLINK-18581 as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 13/07/2020 11:14, Jark Wu wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Chesnay,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As discussed in the thread, 1.11.1 is a quick fix release, not a
>>>>> normal fix
>>>>>>> release process. This is in order to deliver a complete feature for
>>>>> users
>>>>>>> to try out 1.11 ASAP.
>>>>>>> Actually, we already waited for the bugs for one week, and we have
>>>>> received
>>>>>>> some blocker issues reported by users (FLINK-18544, FLINK-18573).
>>>>>>> Personally, I suggest not to wait more time to collect bugs, because we
>>>>>>> can't wait until all the bugs are found and this will delay the feature
>>>>>>> delivery again.
>>>>>>> We can launch another patch release at any time after 1.11.1 if needed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regarding FLINK-18573, I think it definitely is a blocker issue and
>>>>>>> considering we haven't started the first RC. I think it makes sense to
>>>>> wait
>>>>>>> for this.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 16:42, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Given that we are _just now_ starting to get bug reports, shouldn't we
>>>>>>>> wait a bit longer with the next release?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 13/07/2020 10:30, Yun Tang wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If we decide to release Flink-1.11.1, I suggest to include fix for
>>>>>>>> FLINK-18573 [1] as current influxdb metrics reporter is totally
>>>>> broken from
>>>>>>>> Flink-1.11 under current plugins mechanism.
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18573
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>> Yun Tang
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>> From: Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 15:06
>>>>>>>>> To: Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: dev <dev@flink.apache.org>; Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org
>>>>>> ;
>>>>>>>> Timo Walther <j...@apache.org>; programg...@163.com <
>>>>> programg...@163.com>
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.11.1 soon?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the confirmation, Leonard!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月13日,上午11:37,Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dian for the work, I’m fine with do not include FLINK-17726
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> this bug-fix version.
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Leonard Xu
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月13日,11:31,Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I have gone over the issues mentioned in this thread and most
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>> have already been resolved. Thanks you all for the quick fix!
>>>>>>>>>>> Currently there are still the following mentioned issues are open:
>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-17075:  Add task status reconciliation between TM and JM
>>>>>>>> (@Chesnay)
>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18477: ChangelogSocketExample does not work  (@Timo)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding to FLINK-17726, I confirmed with @Nicholas Jiang and it
>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> not be included in 1.11.1. @Leonard Xu, do you have any concerns?
>>>>>>>>>>> Please free free to let me know if there are any other issues you'd
>>>>>>>> like to be included in 1.11.1. I will prepare the first RC once all
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> mentioned issues are resolved.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dian
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月10日,上午11:06,godfrey he <godfre...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a quick release to fix those blocker/critical bugs.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Godfrey
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月10日周五 上午10:30写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a quick bug fix release for 1.11
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Congxian
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月10日周五 上午9:37写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Jark for bringing this up and Dian for volunteering
>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 09:29, Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a quick bug fix release and Dian as the release manager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hequn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:22 PM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for offering the help. It would definitely be helpful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月9日,下午8:54,Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a quick bug fix release for 1.11
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2020年7月9日周四
>>>>> 下午8:11写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd also be in favour of releasing a 1.11.1 quickly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09.07.20 13:57, Jark Wu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dian,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Glad to hear that you want to be the release manager of
>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am very willing to help you with the final steps of the
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 17:57, Jingsong Li <
>>>>>>>> jingsongl...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-18461 is really a blocker for the CDC feature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.1 soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jingsong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:34 PM jincheng sun <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sunjincheng...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for bring up this discussion Jark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, looking forward the first bugfix version of Flink
>>>>> 1.11.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jincheng
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月9日周四 下午5:28写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jark for bringing up this discussion. I also
>>>>> noticed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already users trying out the CDC feature and so it makes
>>>>>>>> sense
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quick 1.11.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would volunteer as the release manager of 1.11.1 if we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> finally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a quick release. Also +1 to create the first RC on
>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月9日,下午3:55,Dawid Wysakowicz <
>>>>>>>> dwysakow...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do agree it would be beneficial to have the 1.11.1
>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally additionally to Jark's list I'd like to see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-18419  Can not create a catalog from user jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18419)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incluedd. It has a PR already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/07/2020 09:51, Leonard Xu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Jark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks fro bringing this discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We canceled the blocker priority of FLINK-18461 when
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.0 from time consideration, IIRC, the majority of us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timely 1.11.1 in the vote mail of Flink 1.11.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I have noticed some user voice[1][2] that they’re
>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CDC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in mail list and offline communication with community
>>>>> user,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following notable issues should be included in 1.11.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18461 Changelog source can't be insert into
>>>>> upsert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sink
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18426 Incompatible deprecated key type for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18434 Can not select fields with JdbcCatalog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-17726 Scheduler should take care of tasks
>>>>> directly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> canceled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TaskManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-17075 Add task status reconciliation between
>>>>> TM
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So,  +1 to prepare a quick bug-fix version from my
>>>>> side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leonard Xu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] user:
>>>>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flip-105-can-the-debezium-canal-SQL-sink-to-database-directly-td36275.html#a36306
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flip-105-can-the-debezium-canal-SQL-sink-to-database-directly-td36275.html#a36306
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] user-zh:
>>>>> http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/flink-1-11-cdc-flink-sql-kafka-topic-tt4567.html#a4590
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/flink-1-11-cdc-flink-sql-kafka-topic-tt4567.html#a4590
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月9日,11:12,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Besides, it would be great if we can figure out the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regression
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas reported before.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know what's the status now? @zhijiang <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Thomas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 11:10, Jark Wu <
>>>>> imj...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As discussed in the voting thread of 1.11.0-RC4
>>>>> [1], we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue about the CDC feature [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Considering this is a new kind of connector, we
>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready-to-publish RC4 and prefer to have an
>>>>> immediately
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I would like to start the discussion
>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon, to deliver a complete CDC feature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can also release some notable bug fixes found in
>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest not to wait too long to collect/fix bugs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise it will delay the feature delivery again,
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> launch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch release after that if needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most notable bug fixes so far are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18461 Changelog source can't be insert into
>>>>>>>> upsert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sink
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18426 Incompatible deprecated key type for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> options
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I think it would be better if we can
>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18434 Can not select fields with
>>>>> JdbcCatalog (PR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18520 New Table Function type inference
>>>>> fails
>>>>>>>> (PR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18477 ChangelogSocketExample does not work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to suggest creating the first RC next
>>>>> Monday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are any concerns or missing blocker issues
>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1, please let me know. Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-1-11-0-release-candidate-4-tp42829p42858.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18461
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to