Thanks Robert for bringing up this discussion. This is very important to ensure 
that we have a smooth release process as there are only two months left before 
feature freeze.

It would be good to have a list of the features for 1.12 as soon as possible. 
Welcome any one to post the feature list which you think important and want in 
1.12.

Regards,
Dian

> 在 2020年7月23日,上午12:10,Prasanna kumar <prasannakumarram...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Hi Flink Dev Team,
> 
> Dynamic AutoScaling Based on the incoming data load would be a great feature. 
> 
> We should be able have some rule say If the load increased by 20% , add extra 
> resource should be added. 
> Or time based say during these peak hours the pipeline should scale 
> automatically by 50%.
> 
> This will help a lot in cost reduction.
> 
> EMR cluster provides a similar feature for SPARK based application.
> 
> Thanks,
> Prasanna.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:40 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org 
> <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Now that the 1.11 release is out, it is time to plan for the next major
> Flink release.
> 
> Some items:
> 
>    1.
> 
>    Dian Fu and me volunteer to be the release managers for Flink 1.12.
> 
> 
> 
>    1.
> 
>    Timeline: We propose to stick to our approximate 4 month release cycle,
>    thus the release should be done by late October. Given that there’s a
>    holiday week in China at the beginning of October, I propose to do the
>    feature freeze on master by late September.
> 
>    2.
> 
>    Collecting features: It would be good to have a rough overview of the
>    features that will likely be ready to be merged by late September, and that
>    we want in the release.
>    Based on the discussion, we will update the Roadmap on the Flink website
>    again!
> 
> 
> 
>    1.
> 
>    Test instabilities and blockers: I would like to avoid a situation where
>    we have many blocking issues or build instabilities at the time of the
>    feature freeze. To achieve that, we will try to check every build
>    instability within a week, to decide if it is a blocker (make sure to use
>    the “test-stability” label for those tickets!)
>    Blocker issues will need to have somebody assigned (responsible) within
>    a week, and we want to see progress on all blocker issues (downgrade,
>    resolution, a good plan how to proceed if it is more complicated)
> 
>    2.
> 
>    Quality and stability of new features: In order to have a short feature
>    freeze phase, we encourage developers to only merge well-tested and
>    documented features. In our experience, the feature freeze works best if
>    new features are complete, and the community can focus fully on addressing
>    newly found bugs and voting the release.
>    By having a smooth release process, the next merge-window for the next
>    release will come sooner.
> 
> 
> Let me know what you think about our items, and share which features you
> want in Flink 1.12.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Robert & Dian

Reply via email to