As a second thought, I think "Eager State Declaration" is probably not a must-have.
I was originally thinking it is a prerequisite for "state querying for disaggregated state management". Since disaggregated state management itself is not a must-have, "Eager State Declaration" is not as well. We can downgrade it to "nice to have" if no objection. Best Yuan On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:02 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:52 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for driving this and great to see us moving forward. > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 11:59, Feng Wang <wangfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > Thanks for driving this, looking forward to the next stage of flink. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:31 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to start the VOTE for the must-have work items for release > 2.0 > > > > [1]. The corresponding discussion thread is [2]. > > > > > > > > Please note that once the vote is approved, any changes to the > > must-have > > > > items (adding / removing must-have items, changing the priority) > > requires > > > > another vote. Assigning contributors / reviewers, updating > > descriptions / > > > > progress, changes to nice-to-have items do not require another vote. > > > > > > > > The vote will be open until at least July 12, following the consensus > > > > voting process. Votes of PMC members are binding. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Xintong > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.0+Release > > > > > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3dkdypyrovd3txzodn07lgdwtwvhgk4 > > > > > > > > > >
