Sorry for taking so long

I've added a section about Flink Disaggregated State Management Evolution
in the attached doc.

I found some of the contents might be overlapped with the "large-scale
streaming jobs". So that part might need some changes as well.

Please let me know what you think.

Best
Yuan

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry have missed this email and respond a bit late.
>
> I will put a draft for the long-term vision for the state as well as
> large-scale state support into the roadmap.
>
> Best
> Yuan
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jiabao,
>>
>> Thank you for your suggestions. I have added them to the "Going Beyond a
>> SQL Stream/Batch Processing Engine" and "Large-Scale State Jobs" sections.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jark
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:06, Jiabao Sun <jiabao....@xtransfer.cn
>> .invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Jark and Martijn for driving this.
>> >
>> > There are two suggestions about the Table API:
>> >
>> > - Add the JSON type to adapt to the no sql database type.
>> > - Remove changelog normalize operator for upsert stream.
>> >
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Jiabao
>> >
>> >
>> > > 2023年7月13日 下午3:49,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道:
>> > >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Sorry for taking so long back here.
>> > >
>> > > Martijn and I have drafted the first version of the updated roadmap,
>> > > including the updated feature radar reflecting the current state of
>> > > different components.
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12BDiVKEsY-f7HI3suO_IxwzCmR04QcVqLarXgyJAb7c/edit
>> > >
>> > > Feel free to leave comments in the thread or the document.
>> > > We may miss mentioning something important, so your help in enriching
>> > > the content is greatly appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Jark & Martijn
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 00:50, Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Jark,
>> > >>
>> > >> Fair enough. Let's do it like you suggested. Thanks!
>> > >>
>> > >> Best regards,
>> > >> Jing
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:00 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi Jing,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> This thread is for discussing the roadmap for versions 1.18, 2.0,
>> and
>> > >> even
>> > >>> more.
>> > >>> One of the outcomes of this discussion will be an updated version of
>> > the
>> > >>> current roadmap.
>> > >>> Let's work together on refining the roadmap in this thread.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Best,
>> > >>> Jark
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 23:25, Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Hi Jark,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Thanks for driving it! For point 2, since we are developing 1.18
>> now,
>> > >>>> does it make sense to update the roadmap this time while we are
>> > >> releasing
>> > >>>> 1.18? This discussion thread will be focusing on the Flink 2.0
>> > roadmap,
>> > >>> as
>> > >>>> you mentioned previously. WDYT?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Best regards,
>> > >>>> Jing
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 3:31 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Hi all,
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Martijn and I would like to initiate a discussion on the Flink
>> > >> roadmap,
>> > >>>>> which should cover the project's long-term roadmap and the regular
>> > >>> update
>> > >>>>> mechanism.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Xintong has already started a discussion about Flink 2.0 planning.
>> > >> One
>> > >>> of
>> > >>>>> the points raised in that discussion is that we should have a
>> > >>> high-level
>> > >>>>> discussion of the roadmap to present where the project is heading
>> > >>> (which
>> > >>>>> doesn't necessarily need to block the Flink 2.0 planning).
>> Moreover,
>> > >>> the
>> > >>>>> roadmap on the Flink website [1] hasn't been updated for half a
>> year,
>> > >>> and
>> > >>>>> the last update was for the feature radar for the 1.15 release. It
>> > >> has
>> > >>>> been
>> > >>>>> 2 years since the community discussed Flink's overall roadmap.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I would like to raise two topics for discussion:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> 1. The new roadmap. This should be an updated version of the
>> current
>> > >>>>> roadmap[1].
>> > >>>>> 2. A mechanism to regularly discuss and update the roadmap.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> To make the first topic discussion more efficient, Martijn and I
>> > >>>> volunteer
>> > >>>>> to summarize the ongoing big things of different components and
>> > >>> present a
>> > >>>>> roadmap draft to the community in the next few weeks. This should
>> be
>> > >> a
>> > >>>> good
>> > >>>>> starting point for a more detailed discussion.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Regarding the regular update mechanism, there was a proposal in a
>> > >>> thread
>> > >>>>> [2] three years ago to make the release manager responsible for
>> > >>> updating
>> > >>>>> the roadmap. However, it appears that this was not documented as a
>> > >>>> release
>> > >>>>> management task [3], and the roadmap update wasn't performed for
>> > >>> releases
>> > >>>>> 1.16 and 1.17.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> In my opinion, making release managers responsible for keeping the
>> > >>>> roadmap
>> > >>>>> up to date is a good idea. Specifically, release managers of
>> release
>> > >> X
>> > >>>> can
>> > >>>>> kick off the roadmap update at the beginning of release X, which
>> can
>> > >>> be a
>> > >>>>> joint task with collecting a feature list [4]. Additionally,
>> release
>> > >>>>> managers of release X-1 can help verify and remove the
>> accomplished
>> > >>> items
>> > >>>>> from the roadmap and update the feature radar.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> What do you think? Do you have other ideas?
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Best,
>> > >>>>> Jark & Martijn
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> [1]: https://flink.apache.org/roadmap.html
>> > >>>>> [2]:
>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/o0l3cg6yphxwrww0k7215jgtw3yfoybv
>> > >>>>> [3]:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Release+Management
>> > >>>>> [4]:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/1.18+Release
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to