Nice! =)
- Henry
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Márton Balassi
<balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It turns out that we received the new repo and the ldap group at the same
> time - so I guess problem solved. ;)
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > When you said "finish the release" meaning distribute/publish a TLP
>> > release in the incubating branch repo?
>>
>>
>> Marton did like 40% of the release work by now. I think it would be best if
>> Marton gets his chance to finish the release. Sadly, the TLP migration
>> seems to block it right now.
>> The release will look like a TLP release even though our repo is called
>> "incubator-flink". We already got our release directory, so the artifacts
>> won't be published from the incubator.
>> From my point of view only the ldap group + nexus setup is missing for a
>> TLP release.
>>
>> Once we have our new repo, we can just push the release branch to that repo
>> as well. The commit hash (thats the one really relevant for the release)
>> won't change.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Márton,
>> >
>> > Yes, we could and should move to non-incubating repo. I think Robert
>> > and Stephan are working with Infra to make it happen.
>> >
>> > My question is more should we wait till migration happen or should we
>> > publish non-incubating release artifact to ASF diet and mvn central
>> > from our incubating source repository instead.
>> >
>> > - Henry
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > I assume that infra graduation means that we can move to the
>> > non-incubating
>> > > repo as well.
>> > >
>> > > Also to the best of my knowledge the release is not connected to the
>> > > incubating repo itself. Of course it can be listed on github as well,
>> but
>> > > what makes an apache release is that it can be downloaded from the
>> apache
>> > > distribution mirrors (where it is signed correctly) and from maven
>> > central
>> > > (provided by the apache repository infrastructure). But please correct
>> me
>> > > if I'm wrong.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> When you said "finish the release" meaning distribute/publish a TLP
>> > >> release in the incubating branch repo?
>> > >>
>> > >> - Henry
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Allright .. I've asked infra and they plan to do the graduation this
>> > week
>> > >> > ("hopefully today/tomorrow").
>> > >> > If that is really going to happen in the next days, I would suggest
>> to
>> > >> let
>> > >> > Marton finish the release. If there are any major delays due to
>> INFRA,
>> > >> I'll
>> > >> > do the release.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Robert Metzger <
>> rmetz...@apache.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Thanks for the update.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Happy new year to everyone.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> It seems that we have to wait for INFRA to finish the LDAP group
>> > >> creation
>> > >> >> for the new TLP first, since this is connected to the maven
>> > repository.
>> > >> >> If nothing happened until Monday, I'll ask infra on their IRC chat
>> if
>> > >> they
>> > >> >> can resolve the LDAP group creation.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Robert
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Márton Balassi <
>> > >> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> Happy new year Flinkers,
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> I'm sorry that I could not report any progress on the release yet.
>> > It
>> > >> was
>> > >> >>> finally clarified that we are actually blocked by the apache
>> > >> >>> infrastructure
>> > >> >>> at the moment. [1]
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8954
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Marton
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> > >> henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > Thanks for the update Marton.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > So with we are graduating it is coming as blessing but
>> > unfortunately
>> > >> >>> > adding more work to the release process.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Please do let us know if you need any help with the release.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > - Henry
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Márton Balassi
>> > >> >>> > <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > +1 on quickstart, I'm having a look at it tomorrow.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > Robert also pointed out the the DISCLAIMER file (for
>> incubation,
>> > >> >>> > currently
>> > >> >>> > > also added to the distribution) is no longer needed neither on
>> > the
>> > >> >>> master
>> > >> >>> > > nor on the release branch. Other minor things in the repo
>> > regarding
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> > > graduation:
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > * Eliminating the incubating subscript from the project
>> > version
>> > >> >>> > > * Updating the the docs (mostly mentioned in variables,
>> > >> sometimes in
>> > >> >>> > > since given version that should not be changed)
>> > >> >>> > > * Updating the quickstart scripts (more related to simply
>> > >> releasing)
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > I'm deleting the DISCLAIMER from the repo and the assemblies,
>> > >> bumping
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> > > version and updating the parts of the docs that can be done
>> > prior
>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> > > release.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > As for the state of the relese: With the help of Robert I have
>> > >> >>> acquired
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > > necessary knowledge and set up the tools needed for the
>> > release. I
>> > >> >>> have
>> > >> >>> > > still minor issues with maven, but I'm confident that the
>> > solution
>> > >> is
>> > >> >>> > near.
>> > >> >>> > > I also fell motivated to write down my experiences in a
>> > >> documentation
>> > >> >>> to
>> > >> >>> > > spare some time for up and coming release managers.
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > Best,
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > Marton
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> > >> >>> aljos...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> +1
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Robert Metzger <
>> > >> rmetz...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> > Hi guys,
>> > >> >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> > I vote to make this issue a release blocker:
>> > >> >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1225
>> > >> >>> > >> > Two users ran into the issue within 2 days. The quickstart
>> is
>> > >> mean
>> > >> >>> to
>> > >> >>> > >> give
>> > >> >>> > >> > new users a good experience.
>> > >> >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Stephan Ewen <
>> > >> se...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> Hi!
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> I forked a branch "release-0.8" and bumped the master
>> > version
>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> > >> >> "0.9-incubating-SNAPSHOT".
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> The closure cleaner is merged. Robert has opened a PR for
>> > Kryo
>> > >> - I
>> > >> >>> > would
>> > >> >>> > >> >> suggest to merge that to "master", cherry-pick to
>> > "release-0.8"
>> > >> >>> and
>> > >> >>> > >> then:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> Merry releasing!
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> Greetings,
>> > >> >>> > >> >> Stephan
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Márton Balassi <
>> > >> >>> > >> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > @Timo&Stephan: The streaming code uses this since last
>> > week
>> > >> [1],
>> > >> >>> > Timo
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > starting working on the issue prior way before that - so
>> > it
>> > >> also
>> > >> >>> > has
>> > >> >>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> > >> >> do
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > with the streaming team pushing last minute features to
>> be
>> > >> >>> > honest...
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > Then are we waiting for the Java Clousure cleaner and
>> the
>> > >> Kyro
>> > >> >>> > >> support, I
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > guess.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > Aljoscha has already issued a PR for the former, some
>> > >> additional
>> > >> >>> > >> testing
>> > >> >>> > >> >> is
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > needed from the looks of it. [2]
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > [1]
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=51c1f67791307c2b9355171f7398d104befc8de5
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/269
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Timo Walther <
>> > >> >>> fl...@twalthr.com>
>> > >> >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > Yes, I also think so. Stability is more important.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > Am 16.12.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Stephan Ewen <
>> > >> >>> se...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > Yes, the fact that we both did not realize that
>> until
>> > now
>> > >> >>> sort
>> > >> >>> > of
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > reveals
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > that there are more implications than anticipated.
>> > That
>> > >> is
>> > >> >>> > never
>> > >> >>> > >> good
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > for
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > "last minute" patches.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > That's why I would like to merge it into 0.8.1 and
>> > 0.9,
>> > >> >>> rather
>> > >> >>> > >> than
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > 0.8.0
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > That gives the code a bit more testing/use and us a
>> > bit
>> > >> more
>> > >> >>> > time
>> > >> >>> > >> to
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > thoroughly think the implications through.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Timo Walther <
>> > >> >>> > fl...@twalthr.com
>> > >> >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> Sorry I totally forgot to check the streaming API.
>> Do
>> > >> they
>> > >> >>> use
>> > >> >>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> getXXXReturnTypes() methods of the TypeExtractor?
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> Am 16.12.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Robert Metzger <
>> > >> >>> > >> rmetz...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> I've worked on adding Kryo support to Flink
>> today. I
>> > >> would
>> > >> >>> > >> really
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > like
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > to
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> include this into the release. Many users were
>> > >> complaining
>> > >> >>> > about
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > this (
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-610).
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> I've based my work on top of Timo's pull request.
>> If
>> > >> we're
>> > >> >>> > not
>> > >> >>> > >> >> going
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > to
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> merge it, I will have to rebase my code to the
>> > current
>> > >> >>> > master.
>> > >> >>> > >> ...
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > I'll
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> try
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> and see if its easily doable.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Stephan Ewen <
>> > >> >>> > >> se...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> Yes, one thing I just realized is that the
>> > streaming
>> > >> API
>> > >> >>> is
>> > >> >>> > not
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > aware
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > of
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> MissingTypeInfos and it may cause weird behavior.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Fabian Hueske <
>> > >> >>> > >> >> fhue...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> +1 for stability first
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> 2014-12-16 16:50 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <
>> > >> >>> se...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> I am currently working through the type hints
>> > pull
>> > >> >>> > request...
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Right now, I actually think that we should
>> > postpone
>> > >> >>> this
>> > >> >>> > for
>> > >> >>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > next
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> bugfix release.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> This pull request changes actually some tricky
>> > >> >>> mechanisms
>> > >> >>> > in
>> > >> >>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > Java
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> API
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> (it delays the type information), which may
>> have
>> > >> >>> > implications
>> > >> >>> > >> >> that
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > me
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> and
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Timo have not fully caught now.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> I don't feel Merging this last minute - this is
>> > >> prone
>> > >> >>> to
>> > >> >>> > >> >> introduce
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> errors.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Any opinions on that?
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stephan Ewen <
>> > >> >>> > >> se...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> +1 for adding the closure cleaner...
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Am 16.12.2014 15:23 schrieb "Aljoscha
>> Krettek" <
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > aljos...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> :
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Do we want the Java Closure Cleaner in 0.8 as
>> > well?
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Márton
>> > Balassi
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cool, thanks.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Stephan
>> > Ewen <
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > se...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> The type hints PR is ready now, Timo made
>> > some
>> > >> >>> final
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > adjustments
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> yesterday
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> evening. I'll review and merge it now, then
>> > we
>> > >> can
>> > >> >>> > fork
>> > >> >>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> branch.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Stephan
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Márton
>> > >> Balassi <
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> balassi.mar...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Checking the PRs listed by Stephan it
>> seems
>> > >> every
>> > >> >>> > import
>> > >> >>> > >> >> one
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> has
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> been
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> merged. As for the optional ones the
>> > following
>> > >> two
>> > >> >>> > are
>> > >> >>> > >> >> still
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> pending:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Add support for Subclasses, Interfaces,
>> > >> Abstract
>> > >> >>> > >> Classes as
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> POJOs
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1245] Introduce TypeHints for Java
>> > API
>> > >> >>> > operators
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Robert +1'd the TypeHints PR and Timo has
>> > just
>> > >> >>> > updated
>> > >> >>> > >> it.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> Should
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> we
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> wait
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> for it?
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Marton
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ufuk
>> > Celebi <
>> > >> >>> > >> >> u...@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Stephan
>> > Ewen
>> > >> <
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> se...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> ----------------------------------------------
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Pull Requests to merge:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> ----------------------------------------------
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1287] LocalizableSplitAssigner
>> > prefers
>> > >> >>> > splits
>> > >> >>> > >> with
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> less
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> degrees
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1305] [FLINK-1304] Test for
>> > >> >>> > HadoopInputWrapper
>> > >> >>> > >> and
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> NullWritable
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> support
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Upgraded HBase addon to HBase 0.98.x and
>> > new
>> > >> >>> Tuple
>> > >> >>> > >> APIs +
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> fix
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> of
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ExecutionEnvironment
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (this is partially merged, there are a
>> few
>> > >> POM
>> > >> >>> > entries
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> missing
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> for
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop 1
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> support)
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The first two PRs are still open. I will
>> > have
>> > >> a
>> > >> >>> > look at
>> > >> >>> > >> >> them
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> as
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> well
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (Robert already tested one).
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @Robert:
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the Hbase PR: Is it resolved by
>> > >> 1b69749
>> > >> >>> > >> ("Enable
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> flink-hbase
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> module for hadoop1 build as well")?
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if had a look at the
>> > >> remaining
>> > >> >>> > >> important
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> ones
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> today.
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> :-)
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
