I assume that infra graduation means that we can move to the non-incubating
repo as well.
Also to the best of my knowledge the release is not connected to the
incubating repo itself. Of course it can be listed on github as well, but
what makes an apache release is that it can be downloaded from the apache
distribution mirrors (where it is signed correctly) and from maven central
(provided by the apache repository infrastructure). But please correct me
if I'm wrong.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> When you said "finish the release" meaning distribute/publish a TLP
> release in the incubating branch repo?
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Allright .. I've asked infra and they plan to do the graduation this week
> > ("hopefully today/tomorrow").
> > If that is really going to happen in the next days, I would suggest to
> let
> > Marton finish the release. If there are any major delays due to INFRA,
> I'll
> > do the release.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the update.
> >>
> >> Happy new year to everyone.
> >>
> >> It seems that we have to wait for INFRA to finish the LDAP group
> creation
> >> for the new TLP first, since this is connected to the maven repository.
> >> If nothing happened until Monday, I'll ask infra on their IRC chat if
> they
> >> can resolve the LDAP group creation.
> >>
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Márton Balassi <
> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Happy new year Flinkers,
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry that I could not report any progress on the release yet. It
> was
> >>> finally clarified that we are actually blocked by the apache
> >>> infrastructure
> >>> at the moment. [1]
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8954
> >>>
> >>> Marton
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks for the update Marton.
> >>> >
> >>> > So with we are graduating it is coming as blessing but unfortunately
> >>> > adding more work to the release process.
> >>> >
> >>> > Please do let us know if you need any help with the release.
> >>> >
> >>> > - Henry
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Márton Balassi
> >>> > <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > +1 on quickstart, I'm having a look at it tomorrow.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Robert also pointed out the the DISCLAIMER file (for incubation,
> >>> > currently
> >>> > > also added to the distribution) is no longer needed neither on the
> >>> master
> >>> > > nor on the release branch. Other minor things in the repo regarding
> >>> the
> >>> > > graduation:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > * Eliminating the incubating subscript from the project version
> >>> > > * Updating the the docs (mostly mentioned in variables,
> sometimes in
> >>> > > since given version that should not be changed)
> >>> > > * Updating the quickstart scripts (more related to simply
> releasing)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm deleting the DISCLAIMER from the repo and the assemblies,
> bumping
> >>> the
> >>> > > version and updating the parts of the docs that can be done prior
> to
> >>> the
> >>> > > release.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > As for the state of the relese: With the help of Robert I have
> >>> acquired
> >>> > the
> >>> > > necessary knowledge and set up the tools needed for the release. I
> >>> have
> >>> > > still minor issues with maven, but I'm confident that the solution
> is
> >>> > near.
> >>> > > I also fell motivated to write down my experiences in a
> documentation
> >>> to
> >>> > > spare some time for up and coming release managers.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Best,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Marton
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >>> aljos...@apache.org>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> +1
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Robert Metzger <
> rmetz...@apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >> > Hi guys,
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > I vote to make this issue a release blocker:
> >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1225
> >>> > >> > Two users ran into the issue within 2 days. The quickstart is
> mean
> >>> to
> >>> > >> give
> >>> > >> > new users a good experience.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Stephan Ewen <
> se...@apache.org>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> Hi!
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> I forked a branch "release-0.8" and bumped the master version
> to
> >>> > >> >> "0.9-incubating-SNAPSHOT".
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> The closure cleaner is merged. Robert has opened a PR for Kryo
> - I
> >>> > would
> >>> > >> >> suggest to merge that to "master", cherry-pick to "release-0.8"
> >>> and
> >>> > >> then:
> >>> > >> >> Merry releasing!
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> Greetings,
> >>> > >> >> Stephan
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Márton Balassi <
> >>> > >> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> >>> > >> >> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> > @Timo&Stephan: The streaming code uses this since last week
> [1],
> >>> > Timo
> >>> > >> >> > starting working on the issue prior way before that - so it
> also
> >>> > has
> >>> > >> to
> >>> > >> >> do
> >>> > >> >> > with the streaming team pushing last minute features to be
> >>> > honest...
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> > Then are we waiting for the Java Clousure cleaner and the
> Kyro
> >>> > >> support, I
> >>> > >> >> > guess.
> >>> > >> >> > Aljoscha has already issued a PR for the former, some
> additional
> >>> > >> testing
> >>> > >> >> is
> >>> > >> >> > needed from the looks of it. [2]
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> > [1]
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=51c1f67791307c2b9355171f7398d104befc8de5
> >>> > >> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/269
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Timo Walther <
> >>> fl...@twalthr.com>
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > >
> >>> > >> >> > > Yes, I also think so. Stability is more important.
> >>> > >> >> > >
> >>> > >> >> > > > Am 16.12.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Stephan Ewen <
> >>> se...@apache.org
> >>> > >:
> >>> > >> >> > > >
> >>> > >> >> > > > Yes, the fact that we both did not realize that until now
> >>> sort
> >>> > of
> >>> > >> >> > reveals
> >>> > >> >> > > > that there are more implications than anticipated. That
> is
> >>> > never
> >>> > >> good
> >>> > >> >> > for
> >>> > >> >> > > > "last minute" patches.
> >>> > >> >> > > >
> >>> > >> >> > > > That's why I would like to merge it into 0.8.1 and 0.9,
> >>> rather
> >>> > >> than
> >>> > >> >> > 0.8.0
> >>> > >> >> > > > That gives the code a bit more testing/use and us a bit
> more
> >>> > time
> >>> > >> to
> >>> > >> >> > > > thoroughly think the implications through.
> >>> > >> >> > > >
> >>> > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Timo Walther <
> >>> > fl...@twalthr.com
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>
> >>> > >> >> > > >> Sorry I totally forgot to check the streaming API. Do
> they
> >>> use
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> >> > > >> getXXXReturnTypes() methods of the TypeExtractor?
> >>> > >> >> > > >>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> Am 16.12.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Robert Metzger <
> >>> > >> rmetz...@apache.org
> >>> > >> >> >:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> I've worked on adding Kryo support to Flink today. I
> would
> >>> > >> really
> >>> > >> >> > like
> >>> > >> >> > > to
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> include this into the release. Many users were
> complaining
> >>> > about
> >>> > >> >> > this (
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-610).
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> I've based my work on top of Timo's pull request. If
> we're
> >>> > not
> >>> > >> >> going
> >>> > >> >> > to
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> merge it, I will have to rebase my code to the current
> >>> > master.
> >>> > >> ...
> >>> > >> >> > I'll
> >>> > >> >> > > >> try
> >>> > >> >> > > >>> and see if its easily doable.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Stephan Ewen <
> >>> > >> se...@apache.org>
> >>> > >> >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> Yes, one thing I just realized is that the streaming
> API
> >>> is
> >>> > not
> >>> > >> >> > aware
> >>> > >> >> > > of
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> MissingTypeInfos and it may cause weird behavior.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Fabian Hueske <
> >>> > >> >> fhue...@gmail.com>
> >>> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> +1 for stability first
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> 2014-12-16 16:50 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <
> >>> se...@apache.org
> >>> > >:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> I am currently working through the type hints pull
> >>> > request...
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Right now, I actually think that we should postpone
> >>> this
> >>> > for
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> >> > > next
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> bugfix release.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> This pull request changes actually some tricky
> >>> mechanisms
> >>> > in
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> >> > > Java
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> API
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> (it delays the type information), which may have
> >>> > implications
> >>> > >> >> that
> >>> > >> >> > > me
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> and
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Timo have not fully caught now.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> I don't feel Merging this last minute - this is
> prone
> >>> to
> >>> > >> >> introduce
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> errors.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Any opinions on that?
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stephan Ewen <
> >>> > >> se...@apache.org
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> +1 for adding the closure cleaner...
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Am 16.12.2014 15:23 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <
> >>> > >> >> > > aljos...@apache.org
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> :
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Do we want the Java Closure Cleaner in 0.8 as well?
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Márton Balassi
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cool, thanks.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Stephan Ewen <
> >>> > >> >> > se...@apache.org
> >>> > >> >> > > >
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi!
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> The type hints PR is ready now, Timo made some
> >>> final
> >>> > >> >> > adjustments
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> yesterday
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> evening. I'll review and merge it now, then we
> can
> >>> > fork
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> branch.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Stephan
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Márton
> Balassi <
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> balassi.mar...@gmail.com
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hey,
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Checking the PRs listed by Stephan it seems
> every
> >>> > import
> >>> > >> >> one
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> has
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> been
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> merged. As for the optional ones the following
> two
> >>> > are
> >>> > >> >> still
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> pending:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Add support for Subclasses, Interfaces,
> Abstract
> >>> > >> Classes as
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> POJOs
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1245] Introduce TypeHints for Java API
> >>> > operators
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Robert +1'd the TypeHints PR and Timo has just
> >>> > updated
> >>> > >> it.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> Should
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> we
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> wait
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> for it?
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Marton
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ufuk Celebi <
> >>> > >> >> u...@apache.org
> >>> > >> >> > >
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Stephan Ewen
> <
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> se...@apache.org>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Important Pull Requests to merge:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1287] LocalizableSplitAssigner prefers
> >>> > splits
> >>> > >> with
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> less
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> degrees
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1305] [FLINK-1304] Test for
> >>> > HadoopInputWrapper
> >>> > >> and
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> NullWritable
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> support
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Upgraded HBase addon to HBase 0.98.x and new
> >>> Tuple
> >>> > >> APIs +
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> fix
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> of
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ExecutionEnvironment
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (this is partially merged, there are a few
> POM
> >>> > entries
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> missing
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> for
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop 1
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> support)
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The first two PRs are still open. I will have
> a
> >>> > look at
> >>> > >> >> them
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> as
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> well
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (Robert already tested one).
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @Robert:
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the Hbase PR: Is it resolved by
> 1b69749
> >>> > >> ("Enable
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> flink-hbase
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> module for hadoop1 build as well")?
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if had a look at the
> remaining
> >>> > >> important
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> ones
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>> today.
> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> :-)
> >>> > >> >> > > >>
> >>> > >> >> > >
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
